Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The performerance of sparse point tracker #11

Closed
Howtian opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

The performerance of sparse point tracker #11

Howtian opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Howtian
Copy link

Howtian commented Feb 27, 2024

Hi, thanks for this excellent work.
I would like to know if the cotracker2 used in dot has been improved or retrained? Because when I tried to replace the cotracker in the dot with the official version of cotracker2, there was a significant decrease in performance.

@Howtian Howtian closed this as completed Mar 1, 2024
@16lemoing
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Howtian ! We use the officially released checkpoints as well. We do not observe a significant decrease in performance. On most datasets we observe that the performance is on par with or slightly better than CoTracker.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants