Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about nuscenes validation performance #74

Open
zoomkinseok opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Question about nuscenes validation performance #74

zoomkinseok opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@zoomkinseok
Copy link

Thank you for your exciting research.
I evaluated it with the model weights (nuscenes detection validation, BEVfusion*) you provided.
It came out the same as the performance reported in the paper. (mAP: 69.6, NDS: 72.1)

The command is as follows.
./tools/dist_test.sh configs/bevfusion/bevf_tf_4x8_10e_nusc_aug.py weights/bevfusion_tf.pth 8 --eval bbox

But is this result without test time augmentation applied? I ask because it seems that MultiScaleFlipAug3D is applied to the test pipeline.

Best,
Minseok Joo

@liyih
Copy link

liyih commented Dec 4, 2023

@zoomkinseok
Is there any difference of performance between with or without MultiScaleFlipAug3D in test pipeline?
Best

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants