Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug report - Invoking deepseek-reasoner via /model deepseek-reasoner causes error #3041

Open
adunato opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@adunato
Copy link

adunato commented Jan 28, 2025

Aider version: 0.72.3
Python version: 3.11.10
Platform: Windows-10-10.0.26100-SP0
Python implementation: CPython
Virtual environment: No
OS: Windows 10 (64bit)
Git version: git version 2.46.0.windows.1

Aider v0.72.3
Model: deepseek-reasoner with diff edit format, infinite output
Git repo: .git with 269 files
Repo-map: using 4096 tokens, auto refresh

litellm.BadRequestError: LLM Provider NOT provided. Pass in the LLM provider you are trying to call. You passed
model=deepseek-reasoner
Pass model as E.g. For 'Huggingface' inference endpoints pass in completion(model='huggingface/starcoder',..) Learn more:
https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/providers

https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/providers

@adunato
Copy link
Author

adunato commented Jan 28, 2025

/model deepseek/deepseek-reasoner has worked before, but will often lead to no response.

I think these may be remote issues with the deepseek API but I wonder whether there needs to be more management on the error side / timeout in aider.

@oregapam
Copy link

I have same issue, no output when I try to use --model r1 argument and try to prompt something. However the web based chat (deepseek.com) have issues too.

@wladimiiir
Copy link

Deepseek API has been experiencing issues for past few days due to some malicious attacks.
You can check the status here: https://status.deepseek.com/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants