You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It only supports two judges though, however, we can use this guys (beet-aizu's) problem links to find relevant judge problems for testing our own codes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
AnimeshSinha1309
added
testing
Automated or Manual tasks to check that there are no bugs in the code.
and removed
enhancement
Improving the quality of code and testing on the notebook
labels
Mar 18, 2020
Are we not already using this to test our code? The documentation sure, but how is this different from our current approach? And what judges does our current approach allow?
I think our approach allows the same two judges only. However, I really dig the generated documentation. I believe the migration to online-judge-verify-helper should be painless, since both are very similar. Can we please do it?
It is as good as our current approach and also generates cool looking documentation.
Example: https://beet-aizu.github.io/library/library/combinatorics/partition.cpp.html
It only supports two judges though, however, we can use this guys (beet-aizu's) problem links to find relevant judge problems for testing our own codes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: