Incorrect condition for lrelease/lrelease-qt5

[bodqhrohro]

Currently, the .pro file assumes that the binary is named lrelease-qt5 on non-macOS Unix-like systems, and lrelease elsewhere. Though I have lrelease binary in the qttools5-dev-tools package from Debian Bullseye. Is the condition not clarified enough, or maybe outdated then?

Actually, I guess that the best strategy would be to check for both variants, and use whatever is present in the system, rather than try to deduce it from unrelated parameters like the platform.

[cppmm]

Also on my system lrelease is placed in /usr/lib64/qt5/bin/lrelease
It don't work with both lrelease and lrelease-qt5. I was able to compile the programm only with full path.