Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
160 lines (135 loc) · 5.58 KB

complex-generics.md

File metadata and controls

160 lines (135 loc) · 5.58 KB

Complex generics

CSharp

Defining generic type arguments using particular marker types like TT in this sample is a distinguishing and outstanding feature. This allows binding complex generic types with nested generic types and with any type constraints. For instance IService<T1, T2, TList, TDictionary> where T2: struct where TList: IList<T1> where TDictionary: IDictionary<T1, T2> { } and its binding to the some implementation .Bind<IService<TT1, TTS2, TTList<TT1>, TTDictionary<TT1, TTS2>>>().To<Service<TT1, TTS2, TTList<TT1>, TTDictionary<TT1, TTS2>>>() with all checks and code-generation at the compile time. It is clear that this example is exaggerated, it just demonstrates the ease of working with marker types like TT, TTEnumerable, TTSet and etc. for binding complex generic types.

interface IDependency<T>;

class Dependency<T>(T value) : IDependency<T>;

readonly record struct DependencyStruct<T> : IDependency<T>
    where T : struct;

interface IService<T1, T2, TList, TDictionary>
    where T2 : struct
    where TList : IList<T1>
    where TDictionary : IDictionary<T1, T2>
{
    IDependency<T1> Dependency1 { get; }

    IDependency<T2> Dependency2 { get; }
}

class Service<T1, T2, TList, TDictionary>(
    IDependency<T1> dependency1,
    [Tag("value type")] IDependency<T2> dependency2)
    : IService<T1, T2, TList, TDictionary>
    where T2 : struct
    where TList : IList<T1>
    where TDictionary : IDictionary<T1, T2>
{
    public IDependency<T1> Dependency1 { get; } = dependency1;

    public IDependency<T2> Dependency2 { get; } = dependency2;
}

class Program<T>(IService<T, int, List<T>, Dictionary<T, int>> service)
    where T : notnull
{
    public IService<T, int, List<T>, Dictionary<T, int>> Service { get; } = service;
}

DI.Setup(nameof(Composition))
    // This hint indicates to not generate methods such as Resolve
    .Hint(Hint.Resolve, "Off")
    .RootArg<TT>("depArg")
    .Bind<IDependency<TT>>().To<Dependency<TT>>()
    .Bind<IDependency<TTS>>("value type")
        .As(Lifetime.Singleton)
        .To<DependencyStruct<TTS>>()
    .Bind<IService<TT1, TTS2, TTList<TT1>, TTDictionary<TT1, TTS2>>>()
        .To<Service<TT1, TTS2, TTList<TT1>, TTDictionary<TT1, TTS2>>>()

    // Composition root
    .Root<Program<TT>>("GetRoot");

var composition = new Composition();
var program = composition.GetRoot<string>(depArg: "some value");
var service = program.Service;
service.ShouldBeOfType<Service<string, int, List<string>, Dictionary<string, int>>>();
service.Dependency1.ShouldBeOfType<Dependency<string>>();
service.Dependency2.ShouldBeOfType<DependencyStruct<int>>();

It can also be useful in a very simple scenario where, for example, the sequence of type arguments does not match the sequence of arguments of the contract that implements the type.

The following partial class will be generated:

partial class Composition
{
  private readonly Composition _root;
  private readonly Lock _lock;

  private DependencyStruct<int> _singletonDependencyStruct51;
  private bool _singletonDependencyStruct51Created;

  [OrdinalAttribute(10)]
  public Composition()
  {
    _root = this;
    _lock = new Lock();
  }

  internal Composition(Composition parentScope)
  {
    _root = (parentScope ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(parentScope)))._root;
    _lock = _root._lock;
  }

  [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)]
  public Program<T1> GetRoot<T1>(T1 depArg)
    where T1: notnull
  {
    if (!_root._singletonDependencyStruct51Created)
    {
      using (_lock.EnterScope())
      {
        if (!_root._singletonDependencyStruct51Created)
        {
          _root._singletonDependencyStruct51 = new DependencyStruct<int>();
          Thread.MemoryBarrier();
          _root._singletonDependencyStruct51Created = true;
        }
      }
    }

    return new Program<T1>(new Service<T1, int, List<T1>, Dictionary<T1, int>>(new Dependency<T1>(depArg), _root._singletonDependencyStruct51));
  }
}

Class diagram:

---
 config:
  class:
   hideEmptyMembersBox: true
---
classDiagram
	ServiceᐸT1ˏInt32ˏListᐸT1ᐳˏDictionaryᐸT1ˏInt32ᐳᐳ --|> IServiceᐸT1ˏInt32ˏListᐸT1ᐳˏDictionaryᐸT1ˏInt32ᐳᐳ
	DependencyStructᐸInt32ᐳ --|> IDependencyᐸInt32ᐳ : "value type" 
	DependencyᐸT1ᐳ --|> IDependencyᐸT1ᐳ
	Composition ..> ProgramᐸT1ᐳ : ProgramᐸT1ᐳ GetRootᐸT1ᐳ(T1 depArg)
	ProgramᐸT1ᐳ *--  ServiceᐸT1ˏInt32ˏListᐸT1ᐳˏDictionaryᐸT1ˏInt32ᐳᐳ : IServiceᐸT1ˏInt32ˏListᐸT1ᐳˏDictionaryᐸT1ˏInt32ᐳᐳ
	ServiceᐸT1ˏInt32ˏListᐸT1ᐳˏDictionaryᐸT1ˏInt32ᐳᐳ *--  DependencyᐸT1ᐳ : IDependencyᐸT1ᐳ
	ServiceᐸT1ˏInt32ˏListᐸT1ᐳˏDictionaryᐸT1ˏInt32ᐳᐳ o-- "Singleton" DependencyStructᐸInt32ᐳ : "value type"  IDependencyᐸInt32ᐳ
	DependencyᐸT1ᐳ o-- T1 : Argument "depArg"
	namespace Pure.DI.UsageTests.Generics.ComplexGenericsScenario {
		class Composition {
		<<partial>>
		+ProgramᐸT1ᐳ GetRootᐸT1ᐳ(T1 depArg)
		}
		class DependencyStructᐸInt32ᐳ {
				<<struct>>
			+DependencyStruct()
		}
		class DependencyᐸT1ᐳ {
			+Dependency(T1 value)
		}
		class IDependencyᐸInt32ᐳ {
			<<interface>>
		}
		class IDependencyᐸT1ᐳ {
			<<interface>>
		}
		class IServiceᐸT1ˏInt32ˏListᐸT1ᐳˏDictionaryᐸT1ˏInt32ᐳᐳ {
			<<interface>>
		}
		class ProgramᐸT1ᐳ {
		}
		class ServiceᐸT1ˏInt32ˏListᐸT1ᐳˏDictionaryᐸT1ˏInt32ᐳᐳ {
			+Service(IDependencyᐸT1ᐳ dependency1, IDependencyᐸInt32ᐳ dependency2)
		}
	}
Loading