From e919c0b2323bedec00e1ecc6280498ff81f59b15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hari Bathini Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 18:00:56 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] bpf ppc32: Access only if addr is kernel address With KUAP enabled, any kernel code which wants to access userspace needs to be surrounded by disable-enable KUAP. But that is not happening for BPF_PROBE_MEM load instruction. Though PPC32 does not support read protection, considering the fact that PTR_TO_BTF_ID (which uses BPF_PROBE_MEM mode) could either be a valid kernel pointer or NULL but should never be a pointer to userspace address, execute BPF_PROBE_MEM load only if addr is kernel address, otherwise set dst_reg=0 and move on. This will catch NULL, valid or invalid userspace pointers. Only bad kernel pointer will be handled by BPF exception table. [Alexei suggested for x86] Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-9-hbathini@linux.ibm.com --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 5dc45e393d1dd5..d3a52cd42f5346 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -820,6 +820,40 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W: case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + off) */ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW: + /* + * As PTR_TO_BTF_ID that uses BPF_PROBE_MEM mode could either be a valid + * kernel pointer or NULL but not a userspace address, execute BPF_PROBE_MEM + * load only if addr is kernel address (see is_kernel_addr()), otherwise + * set dst_reg=0 and move on. + */ + if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) { + PPC_LI32(_R0, TASK_SIZE - off); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLW(src_reg, _R0)); + PPC_BCC(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 5) * 4); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0)); + /* + * For BPF_DW case, "li reg_h,0" would be needed when + * !fp->aux->verifier_zext. Emit NOP otherwise. + * + * Note that "li reg_h,0" is emitted for BPF_B/H/W case, + * if necessary. So, jump there insted of emitting an + * additional "li reg_h,0" instruction. + */ + if (size == BPF_DW && !fp->aux->verifier_zext) + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg_h, 0)); + else + EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP()); + /* + * Need to jump two instructions instead of one for BPF_DW case + * as there are two load instructions for dst_reg_h & dst_reg + * respectively. + */ + if (size == BPF_DW) + PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 3) * 4); + else + PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 2) * 4); + } + switch (size) { case BPF_B: EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, src_reg, off));