- Known Deficiencies
- Quantities Lose Their Units with Some Operations
- Multiplying a pandas.Series with an ~astropy.units.Unit does not produce a |Quantity|
- Numpy array creation functions cannot be used to initialize Quantity
- Quantities Lose Their Units When Broadcasted
- Chained Quantity comparisons to dimensionless zero can be misleading
- mmap Support for
astropy.io.fits
on GNU Hurd - Color Printing on Windows
numpy.int64
does not decompose inputQuantity
objects
- Build/Installation/Test Issues
While most bugs and issues are managed using the astropy issue tracker, this document lists issues that are too difficult to fix, may require some intervention from the user to work around, or are caused by bugs in other projects or packages.
Issues listed on this page are grouped into two categories: The first is known
issues and shortcomings in actual algorithms and interfaces that currently do
not have fixes or workarounds, and that users should be aware of when writing
code that uses astropy
. Some of those issues are still platform-specific,
while others are very general. The second category is of common issues that come
up when configuring, building, or installing astropy
. This also includes
cases where the test suite can report false negatives depending on the context/
platform on which it was run.
Quantities are subclassed from numpy
's ~numpy.ndarray and while we have
ensured that numpy
functions will work well with them, they do not always
work in functions from scipy
or other packages that use numpy
internally, but ignore the subclass. Furthermore, at a few places in numpy
itself we cannot control the behaviour. For instance, care must be taken when
setting array slices using Quantities:
>>> import astropy.units as u >>> import numpy as np >>> a = np.ones(4) >>> a[2:3] = 2*u.kg >>> a # doctest: +FLOAT_CMP array([1., 1., 2., 1.])
>>> a = np.ones(4) >>> a[2:3] = 1*u.cm/u.m >>> a # doctest: +FLOAT_CMP array([1., 1., 1., 1.])
Either set single array entries or use lists of Quantities:
>>> a = np.ones(4) >>> a[2] = 1*u.cm/u.m >>> a # doctest: +FLOAT_CMP array([1. , 1. , 0.01, 1. ])
>>> a = np.ones(4) >>> a[2:3] = [1*u.cm/u.m] >>> a # doctest: +FLOAT_CMP array([1. , 1. , 0.01, 1. ])
Both will throw an exception if units do not cancel, e.g.:
>>> a = np.ones(4) >>> a[2] = 1*u.cm Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: only dimensionless scalar quantities can be converted to Python scalars
See: astropy#7582
Quantities may work with certain operations on ~pandas.Series but this behaviour is not tested. For example, multiplying a ~pandas.Series instance with a unit will not return a |Quantity|. It will return a ~pandas.Series object without any unit:
.. doctest-requires:: pandas>=1.5 >>> import pandas as pd >>> import astropy.units as u >>> a = pd.Series([1., 2., 3.]) >>> a * u.m 0 1.0 1 2.0 2 3.0 dtype: float64
To avoid this, it is best to initialize the |Quantity| directly:
.. doctest-requires:: pandas>=1.5 >>> u.Quantity(a, u.m) <Quantity [1., 2., 3.] m>
Note that the overrides pandas provides are not complete, and as a consequence, using the (in-place) shift operator does work:
.. doctest-requires:: pandas>=1.5 >>> b = a << u.m >>> b <Quantity [1., 2., 3.] m> >>> a <<= u.m >>> a <Quantity [1., 2., 3.] m>
But this is fragile as this may stop working in future versions of pandas if they decide to override the dunder methods.
See: astropy#11247
Trying the following example will ignore the unit:
>>> np.full(10, 1 * u.m) array([1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1.])
A workaround for this at the moment would be to do:
>>> np.full(10, 1) << u.m <Quantity [1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1.] m>
As well as with ~numpy.full one cannot do ~numpy.zeros, ~numpy.ones, and ~numpy.empty.
The ~numpy.arange function does not work either:
>>> np.arange(0 * u.m, 10 * u.m, 1 * u.m) Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: only dimensionless scalar quantities can be converted to Python scalars
Workarounds include moving the units outside of the call to ~numpy.arange:
>>> np.arange(0, 10, 1) * u.m <Quantity [0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.] m>
Also, ~numpy.linspace does work:
>>> np.linspace(0 * u.m, 9 * u.m, 10) <Quantity [0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.] m>
When broadcasting Quantities, it is necessary to pass subok=True
to
~numpy.broadcast_to, or else a bare ~numpy.ndarray will be returned:
>>> q = u.Quantity(np.arange(10.), u.m) >>> b = np.broadcast_to(q, (2, len(q))) >>> b # doctest: +FLOAT_CMP array([[0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.], [0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.]]) >>> b2 = np.broadcast_to(q, (2, len(q)), subok=True) >>> b2 # doctest: +FLOAT_CMP <Quantity [[0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.], [0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.]] m>
This is analogous to the case of passing a Quantity to ~numpy.array:
>>> a = np.array(q) >>> a # doctest: +FLOAT_CMP array([0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.]) >>> a2 = np.array(q, subok=True) >>> a2 # doctest: +FLOAT_CMP <Quantity [0., 1., 2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9.] m>
See: astropy#7832
When chaining comparisons using Quantities and dimensionless zero, the result may be misleading:
>>> 0 * u.Celsius == 0 * u.m # Correct False >>> 0 * u.Celsius == 0 == 0 * u.m # Misleading True
What the second comparison is really doing is this:
>>> (0 * u.Celsius == 0) and (0 == 0 * u.m) True
See: astropy#15103
On Hurd and possibly other platforms, flush()
on memory-mapped files are not
implemented, so writing changes to a mmap'd FITS file may not be reliable and is
thus disabled. Attempting to open a FITS file in writeable mode with mmap will
result in a warning (and mmap will be disabled on the file automatically).
See: astropy#968
Colored printing of log messages and other colored text does work in Windows, but only when running in the IPython console. Colors are not currently supported in the basic Python command-line interpreter on Windows.
Python's int()
goes through __index__
while numpy.int64
or numpy.int_
do not go through __index__
. This
means that an upstream fix in NumPy is required in order for
astropy.units
to control decomposing the input in these functions:
>>> np.int64((15 * u.km) / (15 * u.imperial.foot)) 1 >>> np.int_((15 * u.km) / (15 * u.imperial.foot)) 1 >>> int((15 * u.km) / (15 * u.imperial.foot)) 3280
To convert a dimensionless ~astropy.units.Quantity to an integer, it is
therefore recommended to use int(...)
.
Upgrading astropy
in the Anaconda Python distribution using pip
can result
in a corrupted install with a mix of files from the old version and the new
version. Anaconda users should update with conda update astropy
. There
may be a brief delay between the release of astropy
on PyPI and its release
via the conda
package manager; users can check the availability of new
versions with conda search astropy
.
On MacOS X, you may see the following error when running pip
:
... ValueError: unknown locale: UTF-8
This is due to the LC_CTYPE
environment variable being incorrectly set to
UTF-8
by default, which is not a valid locale setting.
On MacOS X or Linux (or other platforms) you may also encounter the following error:
... stderr = stderr.decode(stdio_encoding) TypeError: decode() argument 1 must be str, not None
This also indicates that your locale is not set correctly.
To fix either of these issues, set this environment variable, as well as the
LANG
and LC_ALL
environment variables to e.g. en_US.UTF-8
using, in
the case of bash
:
export LANG="en_US.UTF-8" export LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8" export LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
To avoid any issues in future, you should add this line to your e.g.
~/.bash_profile
or .bashrc
file.
To test these changes, open a new terminal and type locale
, and you should
see something like:
$ locale LANG="en_US.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ALL="en_US.UTF-8"
If so, you can go ahead and try running pip
again (in the new
terminal).
When running the Astropy tests using astropy.test()
in an IPython
interpreter, some of the tests in the astropy/tests/test_logger.py
might
fail depending on the version of IPython or other factors.
This is due to mutually incompatible behaviors in IPython and pytest, and is
not due to a problem with the test itself or the feature being tested.
See: astropy#717