Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gff release number is not a number anymore #145

Closed
mpoelchau opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Gff release number is not a number anymore #145

mpoelchau opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@mpoelchau
Copy link
Contributor

RefSeq has changed the way they name annotation releases (https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2023/02/09/new-refseq-annot-names/). It's now a string (e.g. GCF_027563975.1-RS_2023_02) and not an integer (e.g. 100).

CWL is pretty particular about inputs - if an input only has numbers, it will complain and fail if the input type is defined as a string. I'm not sure how to update our workflow to ensure it's backwards compatible with the old release number style.

@mpoelchau mpoelchau added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 1, 2023
@mpoelchau mpoelchau self-assigned this Mar 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant