You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I evaluated Densenet-121 from the provided model and got:
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.292
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.551
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.274
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.213
Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.412
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.364
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.593
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.363
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.227
Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets= 20 ] = 0.553
which is lower than expected (as CMU-Pose was geeting 0.6+ on mAP)
Would you suggest what improvements I should make to increase mAP?
One thing that I noticed is that I can play with ParseObjects parameters too.
Would you be great if you could share the metrics on COCO.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: