forked from simplecov-ruby/simplecov
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathskipping_code_blocks_manually.feature
70 lines (58 loc) · 2.15 KB
/
skipping_code_blocks_manually.feature
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
@test_unit @nocov
Feature:
When code is wrapped in :nocov: comment blocks, it does not count
against the coverage numbers.
Background:
Given SimpleCov for Test/Unit is configured with:
"""
require 'simplecov'
SimpleCov.start 'test_frameworks'
"""
Scenario: Plain run with a nocov'd method
Given a file named "lib/faked_project/nocov.rb" with:
"""
class SourceCodeWithNocov
#:nocov:
def some_weird_code
never_reached
rescue => err
but no one cares about invalid ruby here
end
#:nocov:
end
"""
When I open the coverage report generated with `bundle exec rake test`
Then I should see the source files:
| name | coverage |
| lib/faked_project.rb | 100.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/some_class.rb | 80.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/framework_specific.rb | 75.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/meta_magic.rb | 100.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/nocov.rb | 100.0 % |
And there should be 7 skipped lines in the source files
And the report should be based upon:
| Unit Tests |
Scenario: Number of spaces should not mix up nocov results
Given a file named "lib/faked_project/nocov.rb" with:
"""
class SourceCodeWithNocov
# :nocov:
def some_weird_code
never_reached
rescue => err
but no one cares about invalid ruby here
end
# :nocov:
end
"""
When I open the coverage report generated with `bundle exec rake test`
Then I should see the source files:
| name | coverage |
| lib/faked_project.rb | 100.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/some_class.rb | 80.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/framework_specific.rb | 75.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/meta_magic.rb | 100.0 % |
| lib/faked_project/nocov.rb | 100.0 % |
And there should be 7 skipped lines in the source files
And the report should be based upon:
| Unit Tests |