Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Define overlays in terms of packages not packages in terms of overlays #29

Open
NobbZ opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Define overlays in terms of packages not packages in terms of overlays #29

NobbZ opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@NobbZ
Copy link

NobbZ commented Mar 10, 2022

Currently the packages output is defined in terms of the overlay output in the templates I checked (C and Haskell).

This adds to the 1k instances of nixpkgs problem.

Can we instead define the overlay in terms of the packages output?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@NobbZ