Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

trigger rate and channel rate do not match if used in single trigger mode with one detector #58

Open
musner opened this issue Jul 29, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@musner
Copy link
Collaborator

musner commented Jul 29, 2015

when only connecting one scintillation plate (e.g. to channel 0) and setting the trigger to single, one would expect that the channel 0 rate and the trigger rate match exactly. This is the case for low rates but there are mismatches if the rates are comparably high (>100Hz).

@hpbretz hpbretz added the bug label Jul 29, 2015
@hpbretz hpbretz self-assigned this Jul 29, 2015
@hpbretz
Copy link
Collaborator

hpbretz commented Aug 11, 2015

Rates of >100Hz should be cases where the Threshold is set too low and the rate is mostly noise. Maybe the DAQ card gives a wrong count in these cases. Is the trigger rate too low or too high?

@musner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

musner commented Aug 11, 2015

Rates > 100 Hz was actually a false statement from memory. It was more around 20-30 Hz. I attached a plot. The trigger rate was too small. It did seem to happen with a defect PMT though, so it might have been a hardware problem. But even if the PMT was unstable, should this mismatch really occur?

messungkamiokanne2

@hpbretz
Copy link
Collaborator

hpbretz commented Aug 20, 2015

I don't think it should, but this appers to be a problem of the DAQ, not muonic. In prinicple, muonic just asks the daq every 5s to give a count of the channels and the trigger, substracts the last count for each value and divides it by the time difference. If this happens again or can be reproduced, I would look into it again, otherwise chalk this up to a problem with the DAQ.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants