-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OHM Planet is stale #1792
Comments
@1ec5 Thanks a lot for the hint. Due to several recent changes in https://qlever.cs.uni-freiburg.de/ohm-planet is now up to date again with the latest version (and the remarkable number of 5.4 B triples). |
Thanks! I’ve updated the OSM and OHM examples on the OSM Wiki to reflect ad-freiburg/osm2rdf#111. I’ll try to come up with more examples that take advantage of the newly introduced metadata. |
@1ec5 I see that in some of your queries you restrict to nodes. You don't have to do that: for quite some time now there is a geo:hasCentroid for every object. (and there will soon also be an option to compute distances between arbitrary objects) |
Good point, some of the examples intentionally do that so users know how to filter by element type if they need to, but I’ve updated this query that was unnecessarily limited to nodes. |
I posted a notice about these changes on the OHM Forum, OHM Mastodon, and OSMUS Slack. |
The OHM Planet index hasn’t been updated since January 17, more than three weeks ago:
It looks like new planet files are still being produced daily in the usual location.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: