Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OHM Planet is stale #1792

Closed
1ec5 opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 5 comments
Closed

OHM Planet is stale #1792

1ec5 opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 5 comments

Comments

@1ec5
Copy link

1ec5 commented Feb 10, 2025

The OHM Planet index hasn’t been updated since January 17, more than three weeks ago:

OHM Planet, data from https://planet.openhistoricalmap.org/planet version 17.01.2025 (with GeoSPARQL predicates ogc:sfContains and ogc:sfIntersects)

It looks like new planet files are still being produced daily in the usual location.

@hannahbast
Copy link
Member

hannahbast commented Feb 12, 2025

@1ec5 Thanks a lot for the hint. Due to several recent changes in osm2rdf (more metadata by default), our automatic pipeline ran out of memory and we didn't notice.

https://qlever.cs.uni-freiburg.de/ohm-planet is now up to date again with the latest version (and the remarkable number of 5.4 B triples).

@1ec5
Copy link
Author

1ec5 commented Feb 12, 2025

Thanks! I’ve updated the OSM and OHM examples on the OSM Wiki to reflect ad-freiburg/osm2rdf#111. I’ll try to come up with more examples that take advantage of the newly introduced metadata.

@1ec5 1ec5 closed this as completed Feb 12, 2025
@hannahbast
Copy link
Member

@1ec5 I see that in some of your queries you restrict to nodes. You don't have to do that: for quite some time now there is a geo:hasCentroid for every object.

(and there will soon also be an option to compute distances between arbitrary objects)

@1ec5
Copy link
Author

1ec5 commented Feb 13, 2025

Good point, some of the examples intentionally do that so users know how to filter by element type if they need to, but I’ve updated this query that was unnecessarily limited to nodes.

@1ec5
Copy link
Author

1ec5 commented Feb 13, 2025

I posted a notice about these changes on the OHM Forum, OHM Mastodon, and OSMUS Slack.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants