You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a little confusion about your paper. In section 4.1, Case Study: Les Misérables network, you show us a homophily result with q<1 and a structural equivalence result with q>1. But in previous section, you said q<1 can achieve DFS while q>1 achieve BFS. I wonder why DFS random walks result in homophily result and BFS random walks result in structural equivalence result. Intuitively, I think BFS can make homophily.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there,
I have a little confusion about your paper. In section 4.1,
Case Study: Les Misérables network
, you show us a homophily result with q<1 and a structural equivalence result with q>1. But in previous section, you said q<1 can achieve DFS while q>1 achieve BFS. I wonder why DFS random walks result in homophily result and BFS random walks result in structural equivalence result. Intuitively, I think BFS can make homophily.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: