From 6a1490367c44f94614e39e8b98ff7114ff8a6449 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:44:01 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 01/10] cpufreq: Add policy create/remove notifiers back This effectively reverts some changes made by commit f9f41e3ef99 ("cpufreq: Remove policy create/remove notifiers"). We have a new use case for policy create/remove notifiers (for allocating/freeing QoS requests per policy), so add them back. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar [ rjw: Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 8dda62367816f3..c13dcb59b30cad 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1266,7 +1266,17 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY); dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &policy->nb_min, DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY); - dev_pm_qos_remove_request(policy->max_freq_req); + + if (policy->max_freq_req) { + /* + * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after + * successfully adding max_freq_req request. + */ + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, + CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY, policy); + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(policy->max_freq_req); + } + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(policy->min_freq_req); kfree(policy->min_freq_req); @@ -1391,6 +1401,9 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) ret); goto out_destroy_policy; } + + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, + CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY, policy); } if (cpufreq_driver->get && has_target()) { diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 536a049d7eccca..afc10384a68171 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -458,6 +458,8 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {} /* Policy Notifiers */ #define CPUFREQ_ADJUST (0) #define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (1) +#define CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY (2) +#define CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY (3) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list); From 5130802ddbb10a73cf17d1117e2044c8d5ba7d65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:44:02 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 02/10] thermal: cpu_cooling: Switch to QoS requests for freq limits The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on. Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint for cpu_cooling driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 110 ++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index 4c5db59a619b07..391f39776c6ab8 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -66,8 +67,6 @@ struct time_in_idle { * @last_load: load measured by the latest call to cpufreq_get_requested_power() * @cpufreq_state: integer value representing the current state of cpufreq * cooling devices. - * @clipped_freq: integer value representing the absolute value of the clipped - * frequency. * @max_level: maximum cooling level. One less than total number of valid * cpufreq frequencies. * @freq_table: Freq table in descending order of frequencies @@ -84,12 +83,12 @@ struct cpufreq_cooling_device { int id; u32 last_load; unsigned int cpufreq_state; - unsigned int clipped_freq; unsigned int max_level; struct freq_table *freq_table; /* In descending order */ struct cpufreq_policy *policy; struct list_head node; struct time_in_idle *idle_time; + struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req; }; static DEFINE_IDA(cpufreq_ida); @@ -118,59 +117,6 @@ static unsigned long get_level(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev, return level - 1; } -/** - * cpufreq_thermal_notifier - notifier callback for cpufreq policy change. - * @nb: struct notifier_block * with callback info. - * @event: value showing cpufreq event for which this function invoked. - * @data: callback-specific data - * - * Callback to hijack the notification on cpufreq policy transition. - * Every time there is a change in policy, we will intercept and - * update the cpufreq policy with thermal constraints. - * - * Return: 0 (success) - */ -static int cpufreq_thermal_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, - unsigned long event, void *data) -{ - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; - unsigned long clipped_freq; - struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev; - - if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST) - return NOTIFY_DONE; - - mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock); - list_for_each_entry(cpufreq_cdev, &cpufreq_cdev_list, node) { - /* - * A new copy of the policy is sent to the notifier and can't - * compare that directly. - */ - if (policy->cpu != cpufreq_cdev->policy->cpu) - continue; - - /* - * policy->max is the maximum allowed frequency defined by user - * and clipped_freq is the maximum that thermal constraints - * allow. - * - * If clipped_freq is lower than policy->max, then we need to - * readjust policy->max. - * - * But, if clipped_freq is greater than policy->max, we don't - * need to do anything. - */ - clipped_freq = cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq; - - if (policy->max > clipped_freq) - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, clipped_freq); - break; - } - mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock); - - return NOTIFY_OK; -} - /** * update_freq_table() - Update the freq table with power numbers * @cpufreq_cdev: the cpufreq cooling device in which to update the table @@ -374,7 +320,6 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev, unsigned long state) { struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev = cdev->devdata; - unsigned int clip_freq; /* Request state should be less than max_level */ if (WARN_ON(state > cpufreq_cdev->max_level)) @@ -384,13 +329,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev, if (cpufreq_cdev->cpufreq_state == state) return 0; - clip_freq = cpufreq_cdev->freq_table[state].frequency; cpufreq_cdev->cpufreq_state = state; - cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq = clip_freq; - - cpufreq_update_policy(cpufreq_cdev->policy->cpu); - return 0; + return dev_pm_qos_update_request(&cpufreq_cdev->qos_req, + cpufreq_cdev->freq_table[state].frequency); } /** @@ -554,11 +496,6 @@ static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops cpufreq_power_cooling_ops = { .power2state = cpufreq_power2state, }; -/* Notifier for cpufreq policy change */ -static struct notifier_block thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block = { - .notifier_call = cpufreq_thermal_notifier, -}; - static unsigned int find_next_max(struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table, unsigned int prev_max) { @@ -596,9 +533,16 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev; char dev_name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH]; unsigned int freq, i, num_cpus; + struct device *dev; int ret; struct thermal_cooling_device_ops *cooling_ops; - bool first; + + dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu); + if (unlikely(!dev)) { + pr_warn("No cpu device for cpu %d\n", policy->cpu); + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); + } + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(policy)) { pr_err("%s: cpufreq policy isn't valid: %p\n", __func__, policy); @@ -671,25 +615,29 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np, cooling_ops = &cpufreq_cooling_ops; } + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, &cpufreq_cdev->qos_req, + DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY, + cpufreq_cdev->freq_table[0].frequency); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("%s: Failed to add freq constraint (%d)\n", __func__, + ret); + cdev = ERR_PTR(ret); + goto remove_ida; + } + cdev = thermal_of_cooling_device_register(np, dev_name, cpufreq_cdev, cooling_ops); if (IS_ERR(cdev)) - goto remove_ida; - - cpufreq_cdev->clipped_freq = cpufreq_cdev->freq_table[0].frequency; + goto remove_qos_req; mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock); - /* Register the notifier for first cpufreq cooling device */ - first = list_empty(&cpufreq_cdev_list); list_add(&cpufreq_cdev->node, &cpufreq_cdev_list); mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock); - if (first) - cpufreq_register_notifier(&thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block, - CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); - return cdev; +remove_qos_req: + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&cpufreq_cdev->qos_req); remove_ida: ida_simple_remove(&cpufreq_ida, cpufreq_cdev->id); free_table: @@ -777,7 +725,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_cpufreq_cooling_register); void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) { struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev; - bool last; if (!cdev) return; @@ -786,15 +733,10 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) mutex_lock(&cooling_list_lock); list_del(&cpufreq_cdev->node); - /* Unregister the notifier for the last cpufreq cooling device */ - last = list_empty(&cpufreq_cdev_list); mutex_unlock(&cooling_list_lock); - if (last) - cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block, - CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); - thermal_cooling_device_unregister(cdev); + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&cpufreq_cdev->qos_req); ida_simple_remove(&cpufreq_ida, cpufreq_cdev->id); kfree(cpufreq_cdev->idle_time); kfree(cpufreq_cdev->freq_table); From dce2e3a8414e31fc286a3f8064df773a3af83a26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:44:03 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: powerpc: macintosh: Switch to QoS requests for freq limits The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on. Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint for windfarm_cpufreq_clamp driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/macintosh/windfarm_cpufreq_clamp.c | 77 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/windfarm_cpufreq_clamp.c b/drivers/macintosh/windfarm_cpufreq_clamp.c index 52fd5fca89a086..705c6200814b63 100644 --- a/drivers/macintosh/windfarm_cpufreq_clamp.c +++ b/drivers/macintosh/windfarm_cpufreq_clamp.c @@ -3,9 +3,11 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -16,36 +18,24 @@ static int clamped; static struct wf_control *clamp_control; - -static int clamp_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *self, - unsigned long event, void *data) -{ - struct cpufreq_policy *p = data; - unsigned long max_freq; - - if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST) - return 0; - - max_freq = clamped ? (p->cpuinfo.min_freq) : (p->cpuinfo.max_freq); - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(p, 0, max_freq); - - return 0; -} - -static struct notifier_block clamp_notifier = { - .notifier_call = clamp_notifier_call, -}; +static struct dev_pm_qos_request qos_req; +static unsigned int min_freq, max_freq; static int clamp_set(struct wf_control *ct, s32 value) { - if (value) + unsigned int freq; + + if (value) { + freq = min_freq; printk(KERN_INFO "windfarm: Clamping CPU frequency to " "minimum !\n"); - else + } else { + freq = max_freq; printk(KERN_INFO "windfarm: CPU frequency unclamped !\n"); + } clamped = value; - cpufreq_update_policy(0); - return 0; + + return dev_pm_qos_update_request(&qos_req, freq); } static int clamp_get(struct wf_control *ct, s32 *value) @@ -74,27 +64,60 @@ static const struct wf_control_ops clamp_ops = { static int __init wf_cpufreq_clamp_init(void) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; struct wf_control *clamp; + struct device *dev; + int ret; + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0); + if (!policy) { + pr_warn("%s: cpufreq policy not found cpu0\n", __func__); + return -EPROBE_DEFER; + } + + min_freq = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq; + max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); + + dev = get_cpu_device(0); + if (unlikely(!dev)) { + pr_warn("%s: No cpu device for cpu0\n", __func__); + return -ENODEV; + } clamp = kmalloc(sizeof(struct wf_control), GFP_KERNEL); if (clamp == NULL) return -ENOMEM; - cpufreq_register_notifier(&clamp_notifier, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); + + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, &qos_req, DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY, + max_freq); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("%s: Failed to add freq constraint (%d)\n", __func__, + ret); + goto free; + } + clamp->ops = &clamp_ops; clamp->name = "cpufreq-clamp"; - if (wf_register_control(clamp)) + ret = wf_register_control(clamp); + if (ret) goto fail; clamp_control = clamp; return 0; fail: + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&qos_req); + + free: kfree(clamp); - return -ENODEV; + return ret; } static void __exit wf_cpufreq_clamp_exit(void) { - if (clamp_control) + if (clamp_control) { wf_unregister_control(clamp_control); + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&qos_req); + } } From afe969074eb7d0f52761ed80da15e9a282d19677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 15:49:48 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: powerpc_cbe: Switch to QoS requests for freq limits The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on. Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint for ppc_cbe_cpufreq driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c | 19 +++++- drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h | 8 +++ drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++---------- 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c index b83f36febf037e..c58abb4cca3a25 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c @@ -110,6 +110,13 @@ static int cbe_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) #endif policy->freq_table = cbe_freqs; + cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init(policy); + return 0; +} + +static int cbe_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit(policy); return 0; } @@ -129,6 +136,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cbe_cpufreq_driver = { .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, .target_index = cbe_cpufreq_target, .init = cbe_cpufreq_cpu_init, + .exit = cbe_cpufreq_cpu_exit, .name = "cbe-cpufreq", .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS, }; @@ -139,15 +147,24 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cbe_cpufreq_driver = { static int __init cbe_cpufreq_init(void) { + int ret; + if (!machine_is(cell)) return -ENODEV; - return cpufreq_register_driver(&cbe_cpufreq_driver); + cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(); + + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&cbe_cpufreq_driver); + if (ret) + cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit(); + + return ret; } static void __exit cbe_cpufreq_exit(void) { cpufreq_unregister_driver(&cbe_cpufreq_driver); + cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit(); } module_init(cbe_cpufreq_init); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h index 9d973519d66916..00cd8633b0d9df 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h @@ -20,6 +20,14 @@ int cbe_cpufreq_set_pmode_pmi(int cpu, unsigned int pmode); #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_CBE_PMI) extern bool cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi; +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy); +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(void); +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit(void); #else #define cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi (0) +static inline void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) {} +static inline void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) {} +static inline void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(void) {} +static inline void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit(void) {} #endif diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c index 97c8ee4614b7d4..bc9dd30395c402 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -24,8 +25,6 @@ #include "ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h" -static u8 pmi_slow_mode_limit[MAX_CBE]; - bool cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi = false; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi); @@ -65,64 +64,89 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_set_pmode_pmi); static void cbe_cpufreq_handle_pmi(pmi_message_t pmi_msg) { + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + struct dev_pm_qos_request *req; u8 node, slow_mode; + int cpu, ret; BUG_ON(pmi_msg.type != PMI_TYPE_FREQ_CHANGE); node = pmi_msg.data1; slow_mode = pmi_msg.data2; - pmi_slow_mode_limit[node] = slow_mode; + cpu = cbe_node_to_cpu(node); pr_debug("cbe_handle_pmi: node: %d max_freq: %d\n", node, slow_mode); -} - -static int pmi_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, - unsigned long event, void *data) -{ - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; - struct cpufreq_frequency_table *cbe_freqs = policy->freq_table; - u8 node; - - /* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY - * policy events?) - */ - node = cbe_cpu_to_node(policy->cpu); - - pr_debug("got notified, event=%lu, node=%u\n", event, node); - if (pmi_slow_mode_limit[node] != 0) { - pr_debug("limiting node %d to slow mode %d\n", - node, pmi_slow_mode_limit[node]); + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) { + pr_warn("cpufreq policy not found cpu%d\n", cpu); + return; + } - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, + req = policy->driver_data; - cbe_freqs[pmi_slow_mode_limit[node]].frequency); - } + ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(req, + policy->freq_table[slow_mode].frequency); + if (ret < 0) + pr_warn("Failed to update freq constraint: %d\n", ret); + else + pr_debug("limiting node %d to slow mode %d\n", node, slow_mode); - return 0; + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); } -static struct notifier_block pmi_notifier_block = { - .notifier_call = pmi_notifier, -}; - static struct pmi_handler cbe_pmi_handler = { .type = PMI_TYPE_FREQ_CHANGE, .handle_pmi_message = cbe_cpufreq_handle_pmi, }; +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) +{ + struct dev_pm_qos_request *req; + int ret; + + if (!cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi) + return; + + req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!req) + return; + + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu), req, + DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY, + policy->freq_table[0].frequency); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint (%d)\n", ret); + kfree(req); + return; + } + policy->driver_data = req; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_init); -static int __init cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(void) +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi = pmi_register_handler(&cbe_pmi_handler) == 0; + struct dev_pm_qos_request *req = policy->driver_data; - if (!cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi) - return -ENODEV; + if (cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi) { + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(req); + kfree(req); + } +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_policy_exit); - cpufreq_register_notifier(&pmi_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init(void) +{ + if (!pmi_register_handler(&cbe_pmi_handler)) + cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi = true; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init); - return 0; +void cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit(void) +{ + pmi_unregister_handler(&cbe_pmi_handler); + cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi = false; } -device_initcall(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_init); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cbe_cpufreq_pmi_exit); From 40f0fc2a416b343a604a8131247a150588658d32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:44:06 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 05/10] arch_topology: Use CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY instead of CPUFREQ_NOTIFY CPUFREQ_NOTIFY is going to get removed soon, lets use CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY instead of that here. CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY is called only once (which is exactly what we want here) for each cpufreq policy when it is first created. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c index 63c1e76739f126..8cab1f5a8e0c80 100644 --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, if (!raw_capacity) return 0; - if (val != CPUFREQ_NOTIFY) + if (val != CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY) return 0; pr_debug("cpu_capacity: init cpu capacity for CPUs [%*pbl] (to_visit=%*pbl)\n", From eb58a4fad3432be6e9dc2e35b78ae99f4a40ce5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:44:07 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 06/10] video: sa1100fb: Remove cpufreq policy notifier The cpufreq policy notifier's CPUFREQ_ADJUST notification is going to get removed soon. The notifier callback sa1100fb_freq_policy() isn't doing anything apart from printing a debug message on CPUFREQ_ADJUST notification. There is no point in keeping an otherwise empty callback and registering the notifier. Remove it. Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c | 27 --------------------------- drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c index f7f8dee044b1f2..ae2bcfee338a29 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c @@ -1005,31 +1005,6 @@ sa1100fb_freq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, } return 0; } - -static int -sa1100fb_freq_policy(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, - void *data) -{ - struct sa1100fb_info *fbi = TO_INF(nb, freq_policy); - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; - - switch (val) { - case CPUFREQ_ADJUST: - dev_dbg(fbi->dev, "min dma period: %d ps, " - "new clock %d kHz\n", sa1100fb_min_dma_period(fbi), - policy->max); - /* todo: fill in min/max values */ - break; - case CPUFREQ_NOTIFY: - do {} while(0); - /* todo: panic if min/max values aren't fulfilled - * [can't really happen unless there's a bug in the - * CPU policy verififcation process * - */ - break; - } - return 0; -} #endif #ifdef CONFIG_PM @@ -1242,9 +1217,7 @@ static int sa1100fb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ fbi->freq_transition.notifier_call = sa1100fb_freq_transition; - fbi->freq_policy.notifier_call = sa1100fb_freq_policy; cpufreq_register_notifier(&fbi->freq_transition, CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); - cpufreq_register_notifier(&fbi->freq_policy, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); #endif /* This driver cannot be unloaded at the moment */ diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.h b/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.h index 7a1a9ca33cec55..d0aa33b0b88a8c 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.h +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.h @@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ struct sa1100fb_info { #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ struct notifier_block freq_transition; - struct notifier_block freq_policy; #endif const struct sa1100fb_mach_info *inf; From 8c7d7b4bb172709f71975c2a6e95c9715171603f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:44:08 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 07/10] video: pxafb: Remove cpufreq policy notifier The cpufreq policy notifier's CPUFREQ_ADJUST notification is going to get removed soon. The notifier callback pxafb_freq_policy() isn't doing anything apart from printing a debug message on CPUFREQ_ADJUST notification. There is no point in keeping an otherwise empty callback and registering the notifier. Remove it. Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c | 21 --------------------- drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c index 4282cb117b92a6..f70c9f79622ec8 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c @@ -1678,24 +1678,6 @@ pxafb_freq_transition(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *data) } return 0; } - -static int -pxafb_freq_policy(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *data) -{ - struct pxafb_info *fbi = TO_INF(nb, freq_policy); - struct fb_var_screeninfo *var = &fbi->fb.var; - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; - - switch (val) { - case CPUFREQ_ADJUST: - pr_debug("min dma period: %d ps, " - "new clock %d kHz\n", pxafb_display_dma_period(var), - policy->max); - /* TODO: fill in min/max values */ - break; - } - return 0; -} #endif #ifdef CONFIG_PM @@ -2400,11 +2382,8 @@ static int pxafb_probe(struct platform_device *dev) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ fbi->freq_transition.notifier_call = pxafb_freq_transition; - fbi->freq_policy.notifier_call = pxafb_freq_policy; cpufreq_register_notifier(&fbi->freq_transition, CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER); - cpufreq_register_notifier(&fbi->freq_policy, - CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); #endif /* diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.h b/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.h index b641289c8a9913..86b1e9ab1a38b3 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.h +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.h @@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ struct pxafb_info { #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ struct notifier_block freq_transition; - struct notifier_block freq_policy; #endif struct regulator *lcd_supply; From d15ce412737accaba5e4c7d653b184772da47365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:20:13 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 08/10] ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on. Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint for acpi driver. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 39 ++++++++++-- drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 100 ++++++++++++------------------- drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 84 +++++++++++++------------- include/acpi/processor.h | 26 +++++--- 4 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c index aea8d674a33d10..08da9c29f1e9a8 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c @@ -284,6 +284,29 @@ static int acpi_processor_stop(struct device *dev) return 0; } +bool acpi_processor_cpufreq_init; + +static int acpi_processor_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, + unsigned long event, void *data) +{ + struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; + int cpu = policy->cpu; + + if (event == CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY) { + acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(cpu); + acpi_processor_ppc_init(cpu); + } else if (event == CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY) { + acpi_processor_ppc_exit(cpu); + acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(cpu); + } + + return 0; +} + +static struct notifier_block acpi_processor_notifier_block = { + .notifier_call = acpi_processor_notifier, +}; + /* * We keep the driver loaded even when ACPI is not running. * This is needed for the powernow-k8 driver, that works even without @@ -310,8 +333,12 @@ static int __init acpi_processor_driver_init(void) cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_ACPI_CPUDRV_DEAD, "acpi/cpu-drv:dead", NULL, acpi_soft_cpu_dead); - acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(); - acpi_processor_ppc_init(); + if (!cpufreq_register_notifier(&acpi_processor_notifier_block, + CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER)) { + acpi_processor_cpufreq_init = true; + acpi_processor_ignore_ppc_init(); + } + acpi_processor_throttling_init(); return 0; err: @@ -324,8 +351,12 @@ static void __exit acpi_processor_driver_exit(void) if (acpi_disabled) return; - acpi_processor_ppc_exit(); - acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(); + if (acpi_processor_cpufreq_init) { + cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&acpi_processor_notifier_block, + CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); + acpi_processor_cpufreq_init = false; + } + cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(hp_online); cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_ACPI_CPUDRV_DEAD); driver_unregister(&acpi_processor_driver); diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c index ee87cb6f6e5944..2261713d1aec08 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c @@ -50,57 +50,13 @@ module_param(ignore_ppc, int, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_ppc, "If the frequency of your machine gets wrongly" \ "limited by BIOS, this should help"); -#define PPC_REGISTERED 1 -#define PPC_IN_USE 2 - -static int acpi_processor_ppc_status; - -static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, - unsigned long event, void *data) -{ - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; - struct acpi_processor *pr; - unsigned int ppc = 0; - - if (ignore_ppc < 0) - ignore_ppc = 0; - - if (ignore_ppc) - return 0; - - if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST) - return 0; - - mutex_lock(&performance_mutex); - - pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu); - if (!pr || !pr->performance) - goto out; - - ppc = (unsigned int)pr->performance_platform_limit; - - if (ppc >= pr->performance->state_count) - goto out; - - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, - pr->performance->states[ppc]. - core_frequency * 1000); - - out: - mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex); - - return 0; -} - -static struct notifier_block acpi_ppc_notifier_block = { - .notifier_call = acpi_processor_ppc_notifier, -}; +static bool acpi_processor_ppc_in_use; static int acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(struct acpi_processor *pr) { acpi_status status = 0; unsigned long long ppc = 0; - + int ret; if (!pr) return -EINVAL; @@ -112,7 +68,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(struct acpi_processor *pr) status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, "_PPC", NULL, &ppc); if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND) - acpi_processor_ppc_status |= PPC_IN_USE; + acpi_processor_ppc_in_use = true; if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) { ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PPC")); @@ -124,6 +80,17 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(struct acpi_processor *pr) pr->performance_platform_limit = (int)ppc; + if (ppc >= pr->performance->state_count || + unlikely(!dev_pm_qos_request_active(&pr->perflib_req))) + return 0; + + ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req, + pr->performance->states[ppc].core_frequency * 1000); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_warn("Failed to update perflib freq constraint: CPU%d (%d)\n", + pr->id, ret); + } + return 0; } @@ -184,23 +151,32 @@ int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_get_bios_limit); -void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void) +void acpi_processor_ignore_ppc_init(void) { - if (!cpufreq_register_notifier - (&acpi_ppc_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER)) - acpi_processor_ppc_status |= PPC_REGISTERED; - else - printk(KERN_DEBUG - "Warning: Processor Platform Limit not supported.\n"); + if (ignore_ppc < 0) + ignore_ppc = 0; +} + +void acpi_processor_ppc_init(int cpu) +{ + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); + int ret; + + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(get_cpu_device(cpu), + &pr->perflib_req, DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY, + INT_MAX); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu, + ret); + return; + } } -void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void) +void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(int cpu) { - if (acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED) - cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&acpi_ppc_notifier_block, - CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); - acpi_processor_ppc_status &= ~PPC_REGISTERED; + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&pr->perflib_req); } static int acpi_processor_get_performance_control(struct acpi_processor *pr) @@ -477,7 +453,7 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module) static int is_done = 0; int result; - if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED)) + if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init) return -EBUSY; if (!try_module_get(calling_module)) @@ -513,7 +489,7 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module) * we can allow the cpufreq driver to be rmmod'ed. */ is_done = 1; - if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_IN_USE)) + if (!acpi_processor_ppc_in_use) module_put(calling_module); return 0; @@ -742,7 +718,7 @@ acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance { struct acpi_processor *pr; - if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED)) + if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init) return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(&performance_mutex); diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c index 50fb0107375e52..ec2638f1df4fae 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_thermal"); #define CPUFREQ_THERMAL_MAX_STEP 3 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg); -static unsigned int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 0; #define reduction_pctg(cpu) \ per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, phys_package_first_cpu(cpu)) @@ -61,35 +60,11 @@ static int phys_package_first_cpu(int cpu) static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy policy; - if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu)) + if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu)) return 0; return 1; } -static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, - unsigned long event, void *data) -{ - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; - unsigned long max_freq = 0; - - if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST) - goto out; - - max_freq = ( - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * - (100 - reduction_pctg(policy->cpu) * 20) - ) / 100; - - cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq); - - out: - return 0; -} - -static struct notifier_block acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block = { - .notifier_call = acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier, -}; - static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu) { if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu)) @@ -108,7 +83,10 @@ static int cpufreq_get_cur_state(unsigned int cpu) static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int state) { - int i; + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + struct acpi_processor *pr; + unsigned long max_freq; + int i, ret; if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu)) return 0; @@ -121,33 +99,53 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int state) * frequency. */ for_each_online_cpu(i) { - if (topology_physical_package_id(i) == + if (topology_physical_package_id(i) != topology_physical_package_id(cpu)) - cpufreq_update_policy(i); + continue; + + pr = per_cpu(processors, i); + + if (unlikely(!dev_pm_qos_request_active(&pr->thermal_req))) + continue; + + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(i); + if (!policy) + return -EINVAL; + + max_freq = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * (100 - reduction_pctg(i) * 20)) / 100; + + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); + + ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&pr->thermal_req, max_freq); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_warn("Failed to update thermal freq constraint: CPU%d (%d)\n", + pr->id, ret); + } } return 0; } -void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(void) +void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(int cpu) { - int i; - - i = cpufreq_register_notifier(&acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block, - CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); - if (!i) - acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 1; + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); + int ret; + + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(get_cpu_device(cpu), + &pr->thermal_req, DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY, + INT_MAX); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu, + ret); + return; + } } -void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(void) +void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(int cpu) { - if (acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init) - cpufreq_unregister_notifier - (&acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block, - CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER); + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); - acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 0; + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&pr->thermal_req); } - #else /* ! CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */ static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu) { diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h index 1194a4c78d557f..f936033cb9e6d5 100644 --- a/include/acpi/processor.h +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ #include #include +#include +#include #include #include @@ -230,6 +232,8 @@ struct acpi_processor { struct acpi_processor_limit limit; struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev; struct device *dev; /* Processor device. */ + struct dev_pm_qos_request perflib_req; + struct dev_pm_qos_request thermal_req; }; struct acpi_processor_errata { @@ -296,16 +300,22 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx /* in processor_perflib.c */ #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ -void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void); -void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void); +extern bool acpi_processor_cpufreq_init; +void acpi_processor_ignore_ppc_init(void); +void acpi_processor_ppc_init(int cpu); +void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(int cpu); void acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag); extern int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit); #else -static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void) +static inline void acpi_processor_ignore_ppc_init(void) { return; } -static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void) +static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_init(int cpu) +{ + return; +} +static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(int cpu) { return; } @@ -421,14 +431,14 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_hotplug(struct acpi_processor *pr) int acpi_processor_get_limit_info(struct acpi_processor *pr); extern const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops processor_cooling_ops; #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS) & defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) -void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(void); -void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(void); +void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(int cpu); +void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(int cpu); #else -static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(void) +static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(int cpu) { return; } -static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(void) +static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(int cpu) { return; } From df0eea4488081e0698b0b58ccd1e8c8823e22841 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:44:09 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 09/10] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy notifier events No driver makes reference to these events now, remove them and the code related to them. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 36 +++++++----------------------------- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++---- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index c13dcb59b30cad..e0ee2389549724 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2360,15 +2360,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy); * @policy: Policy object to modify. * @new_policy: New policy data. * - * Pass @new_policy to the cpufreq driver's ->verify() callback, run the - * installed policy notifiers for it with the CPUFREQ_ADJUST value, pass it to - * the driver's ->verify() callback again and run the notifiers for it again - * with the CPUFREQ_NOTIFY value. Next, copy the min and max parameters - * of @new_policy to @policy and either invoke the driver's ->setpolicy() - * callback (if present) or carry out a governor update for @policy. That is, - * run the current governor's ->limits() callback (if the governor field in - * @new_policy points to the same object as the one in @policy) or replace the - * governor for @policy with the new one stored in @new_policy. + * Pass @new_policy to the cpufreq driver's ->verify() callback. Next, copy the + * min and max parameters of @new_policy to @policy and either invoke the + * driver's ->setpolicy() callback (if present) or carry out a governor update + * for @policy. That is, run the current governor's ->limits() callback (if the + * governor field in @new_policy points to the same object as the one in + * @policy) or replace the governor for @policy with the new one stored in + * @new_policy. * * The cpuinfo part of @policy is not updated by this function. */ @@ -2396,26 +2394,6 @@ int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (ret) return ret; - /* - * The notifier-chain shall be removed once all the users of - * CPUFREQ_ADJUST are moved to use the QoS framework. - */ - /* adjust if necessary - all reasons */ - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, - CPUFREQ_ADJUST, new_policy); - - /* - * verify the cpu speed can be set within this limit, which might be - * different to the first one - */ - ret = cpufreq_driver->verify(new_policy); - if (ret) - return ret; - - /* notification of the new policy */ - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, - CPUFREQ_NOTIFY, new_policy); - policy->min = new_policy->min; policy->max = new_policy->max; trace_cpu_frequency_limits(policy); diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index afc10384a68171..c57e88e85c41c6 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -456,10 +456,8 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {} #define CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE (1) /* Policy Notifiers */ -#define CPUFREQ_ADJUST (0) -#define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (1) -#define CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY (2) -#define CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY (3) +#define CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY (0) +#define CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY (1) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list); From c27c38afd871f54b40bd40172cb4e23fba01113c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:44:10 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 10/10] Documentation: cpufreq: Update policy notifier documentation Update documentation with the recent policy notifier updates. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt | 16 ++++------------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt b/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt index 55193e68025093..ed577d9c154b63 100644 --- a/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt +++ b/Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt @@ -57,19 +57,11 @@ transition notifiers. 2.1 CPUFreq policy notifiers ---------------------------- -These are notified when a new policy is intended to be set. Each -CPUFreq policy notifier is called twice for a policy transition: +These are notified when a new policy is created or removed. -1.) During CPUFREQ_ADJUST all CPUFreq notifiers may change the limit if - they see a need for this - may it be thermal considerations or - hardware limitations. - -2.) And during CPUFREQ_NOTIFY all notifiers are informed of the new policy - - if two hardware drivers failed to agree on a new policy before this - stage, the incompatible hardware shall be shut down, and the user - informed of this. - -The phase is specified in the second argument to the notifier. +The phase is specified in the second argument to the notifier. The phase is +CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY when the policy is first created and it is +CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY when the policy is removed. The third argument, a void *pointer, points to a struct cpufreq_policy consisting of several values, including min, max (the lower and upper