From b7ba8134c44b1af78d6ef82ccca6cd9cf046b8a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: J-Donald Tournier Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 01:33:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] docs: fix error in strides explanation as raised in #856 --- docs/getting_started/image_data.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/getting_started/image_data.rst b/docs/getting_started/image_data.rst index c6d4d73de0..8898d50385 100644 --- a/docs/getting_started/image_data.rst +++ b/docs/getting_started/image_data.rst @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ To simplify the specification of these strides, *MRtrix3* typically expects and provides *symbolic* strides. For example, the RAS strides above would be expressed as ``1,2,3``, since this is sufficient to deduce the actual strides once the image dimensions are known. Likewise, LAS would correspond to strides of -``-1,2,3``, PIR to ``-2,-3,1``, etc. This has the advantage that the +``-1,2,3``, PIR to ``3,-1,-2``, etc. This has the advantage that the specification of the strides is then independent of the image dimensions. Using strides to specify ordering also allows the specification to