From 7f0c020ab6ecb513394de9b02df33a5cfc62084f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:34:32 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: get rid of 'tpolicy' from __cpufreq_add_dev() There is no need of this separate variable, use 'policy' instead. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 1e72621ca157e3..127cc6f18ca515 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) { unsigned int j, cpu = dev->id; int ret = -ENOMEM; - struct cpufreq_policy *policy, *tpolicy; + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; unsigned long flags; bool recover_policy = cpufreq_suspended; @@ -1127,10 +1127,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) /* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - list_for_each_entry(tpolicy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) { - if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tpolicy->related_cpus)) { + list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) { + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)) { read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(tpolicy, cpu, dev); + ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev); up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem); return ret; }