YAML is a human readable data serialization language. The full YAML language spec can be read at yaml.org. The simplest form of yaml is just "scalars", "mappings", and "sequences". A scalar is any number or string. The pound/hash symbol (#) begins a comment line. A mapping is a set of key-value pairs where the key ends with a colon. For example:
# a mapping
name: Tom
hat-size: 7A sequence is a list of items where each item starts with a leading dash ('-'). For example:
# a sequence
- x86
- x86_64
- PowerPCYou can combine mappings and sequences by indenting. For example a sequence of mappings in which one of the mapping values is itself a sequence:
# a sequence of mappings with one key's value being a sequence
- name: Tom
cpus:
- x86
- x86_64
- name: Bob
cpus:
- x86
- name: Dan
cpus:
- PowerPC
- x86Sometime sequences are known to be short and the one entry per line is too verbose, so YAML offers an alternate syntax for sequences called a "Flow Sequence" in which you put comma separated sequence elements into square brackets. The above example could then be simplified to :
# a sequence of mappings with one key's value being a flow sequence
- name: Tom
cpus: [ x86, x86_64 ]
- name: Bob
cpus: [ x86 ]
- name: Dan
cpus: [ PowerPC, x86 ]The use of indenting makes the YAML easy for a human to read and understand, but having a program read and write YAML involves a lot of tedious details. The YAML I/O library structures and simplifies reading and writing YAML documents.
YAML I/O assumes you have some "native" data structures which you want to be able to dump as YAML and recreate from YAML. The first step is to try writing example YAML for your data structures. You may find after looking at possible YAML representations that a direct mapping of your data structures to YAML is not very readable. Often the fields are not in the order that a human would find readable. Or the same information is replicated in multiple locations, making it hard for a human to write such YAML correctly.
In relational database theory there is a design step called normalization in which you reorganize fields and tables. The same considerations need to go into the design of your YAML encoding. But, you may not want to change your existing native data structures. Therefore, when writing out YAML there may be a normalization step, and when reading YAML there would be a corresponding denormalization step.
YAML I/O uses a non-invasive, traits based design. YAML I/O defines some abstract base templates. You specialize those templates on your data types. For instance, if you have an enumerated type FooBar you could specialize ScalarEnumerationTraits on that type and define the enumeration() method:
using llvm::yaml::ScalarEnumerationTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
template <>
struct ScalarEnumerationTraits<FooBar> {
static void enumeration(IO &io, FooBar &value) {
...
}
};As with all YAML I/O template specializations, the ScalarEnumerationTraits is used for both reading and writing YAML. That is, the mapping between in-memory enum values and the YAML string representation is only in one place. This assures that the code for writing and parsing of YAML stays in sync.
To specify a YAML mappings, you define a specialization on llvm::yaml::MappingTraits. If your native data structure happens to be a struct that is already normalized, then the specialization is simple. For example:
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Person> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Person &info) {
io.mapRequired("name", info.name);
io.mapOptional("hat-size", info.hatSize);
}
};A YAML sequence is automatically inferred if you data type has begin()/end() iterators and a push_back() method. Therefore any of the STL containers (such as std::vector<>) will automatically translate to YAML sequences.
Once you have defined specializations for your data types, you can programmatically use YAML I/O to write a YAML document:
using llvm::yaml::Output;
Person tom;
tom.name = "Tom";
tom.hatSize = 8;
Person dan;
dan.name = "Dan";
dan.hatSize = 7;
std::vector<Person> persons;
persons.push_back(tom);
persons.push_back(dan);
Output yout(llvm::outs());
yout << persons;This would write the following:
- name: Tom
hat-size: 8
- name: Dan
hat-size: 7And you can also read such YAML documents with the following code:
using llvm::yaml::Input;
typedef std::vector<Person> PersonList;
std::vector<PersonList> docs;
Input yin(document.getBuffer());
yin >> docs;
if ( yin.error() )
return;
// Process read document
for ( PersonList &pl : docs ) {
for ( Person &person : pl ) {
cout << "name=" << person.name;
}
}One other feature of YAML is the ability to define multiple documents in a single file. That is why reading YAML produces a vector of your document type.
When parsing a YAML document, if the input does not match your schema (as expressed in your XxxTraits<> specializations). YAML I/O will print out an error message and your Input object's error() method will return true. For instance the following document:
- name: Tom
shoe-size: 12
- name: Dan
hat-size: 7Has a key (shoe-size) that is not defined in the schema. YAML I/O will automatically generate this error:
YAML:2:2: error: unknown key 'shoe-size'
shoe-size: 12
^~~~~~~~~Similar errors are produced for other input not conforming to the schema.
YAML scalars are just strings (i.e. not a sequence or mapping). The YAML I/O library provides support for translating between YAML scalars and specific C++ types.
The following types have built-in support in YAML I/O:
- bool
- float
- double
- StringRef
- std::string
- int64_t
- int32_t
- int16_t
- int8_t
- uint64_t
- uint32_t
- uint16_t
- uint8_t
That is, you can use those types in fields of MappingTraits or as element type in sequence. When reading, YAML I/O will validate that the string found is convertible to that type and error out if not.
Given that YAML I/O is trait based, the selection of how to convert your data to YAML is based on the type of your data. But in C++ type matching, typedefs do not generate unique type names. That means if you have two typedefs of unsigned int, to YAML I/O both types look exactly like unsigned int. To facilitate make unique type names, YAML I/O provides a macro which is used like a typedef on built-in types, but expands to create a class with conversion operators to and from the base type. For example:
LLVM_YAML_STRONG_TYPEDEF(uint32_t, MyFooFlags)
LLVM_YAML_STRONG_TYPEDEF(uint32_t, MyBarFlags)This generates two classes MyFooFlags and MyBarFlags which you can use in your native data structures instead of uint32_t. They are implicitly converted to and from uint32_t. The point of creating these unique types is that you can now specify traits on them to get different YAML conversions.
An example use of a unique type is that YAML I/O provides fixed sized unsigned integers that are written with YAML I/O as hexadecimal instead of the decimal format used by the built-in integer types:
- Hex64
- Hex32
- Hex16
- Hex8
You can use llvm::yaml::Hex32 instead of uint32_t and the only different will be that when YAML I/O writes out that type it will be formatted in hexadecimal.
YAML I/O supports translating between in-memory enumerations and a set of string values in YAML documents. This is done by specializing ScalarEnumerationTraits<> on your enumeration type and define a enumeration() method. For instance, suppose you had an enumeration of CPUs and a struct with it as a field:
enum CPUs {
cpu_x86_64 = 5,
cpu_x86 = 7,
cpu_PowerPC = 8
};
struct Info {
CPUs cpu;
uint32_t flags;
};To support reading and writing of this enumeration, you can define a ScalarEnumerationTraits specialization on CPUs, which can then be used as a field type:
using llvm::yaml::ScalarEnumerationTraits;
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
template <>
struct ScalarEnumerationTraits<CPUs> {
static void enumeration(IO &io, CPUs &value) {
io.enumCase(value, "x86_64", cpu_x86_64);
io.enumCase(value, "x86", cpu_x86);
io.enumCase(value, "PowerPC", cpu_PowerPC);
}
};
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Info> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Info &info) {
io.mapRequired("cpu", info.cpu);
io.mapOptional("flags", info.flags, 0);
}
};When reading YAML, if the string found does not match any of the strings specified by enumCase() methods, an error is automatically generated. When writing YAML, if the value being written does not match any of the values specified by the enumCase() methods, a runtime assertion is triggered.
Another common data structure in C++ is a field where each bit has a unique meaning. This is often used in a "flags" field. YAML I/O has support for converting such fields to a flow sequence. For instance suppose you had the following bit flags defined:
enum {
flagsPointy = 1
flagsHollow = 2
flagsFlat = 4
flagsRound = 8
};
LLVM_YAML_STRONG_TYPEDEF(uint32_t, MyFlags)To support reading and writing of MyFlags, you specialize ScalarBitSetTraits<> on MyFlags and provide the bit values and their names.
using llvm::yaml::ScalarBitSetTraits;
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
template <>
struct ScalarBitSetTraits<MyFlags> {
static void bitset(IO &io, MyFlags &value) {
io.bitSetCase(value, "hollow", flagHollow);
io.bitSetCase(value, "flat", flagFlat);
io.bitSetCase(value, "round", flagRound);
io.bitSetCase(value, "pointy", flagPointy);
}
};
struct Info {
StringRef name;
MyFlags flags;
};
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Info> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Info& info) {
io.mapRequired("name", info.name);
io.mapRequired("flags", info.flags);
}
};With the above, YAML I/O (when writing) will test mask each value in the bitset trait against the flags field, and each that matches will cause the corresponding string to be added to the flow sequence. The opposite is done when reading and any unknown string values will result in a error. With the above schema, a same valid YAML document is:
name: Tom
flags: [ pointy, flat ]Sometimes a "flags" field might contains an enumeration part defined by a bit-mask.
enum {
flagsFeatureA = 1,
flagsFeatureB = 2,
flagsFeatureC = 4,
flagsCPUMask = 24,
flagsCPU1 = 8,
flagsCPU2 = 16
};To support reading and writing such fields, you need to use the maskedBitSet() method and provide the bit values, their names and the enumeration mask.
template <>
struct ScalarBitSetTraits<MyFlags> {
static void bitset(IO &io, MyFlags &value) {
io.bitSetCase(value, "featureA", flagsFeatureA);
io.bitSetCase(value, "featureB", flagsFeatureB);
io.bitSetCase(value, "featureC", flagsFeatureC);
io.maskedBitSetCase(value, "CPU1", flagsCPU1, flagsCPUMask);
io.maskedBitSetCase(value, "CPU2", flagsCPU2, flagsCPUMask);
}
};YAML I/O (when writing) will apply the enumeration mask to the flags field, and compare the result and values from the bitset. As in case of a regular bitset, each that matches will cause the corresponding string to be added to the flow sequence.
Sometimes for readability a scalar needs to be formatted in a custom way. For instance your internal data structure may use a integer for time (seconds since some epoch), but in YAML it would be much nicer to express that integer in some time format (e.g. 4-May-2012 10:30pm). YAML I/O has a way to support custom formatting and parsing of scalar types by specializing ScalarTraits<> on your data type. When writing, YAML I/O will provide the native type and your specialization must create a temporary llvm::StringRef. When reading, YAML I/O will provide an llvm::StringRef of scalar and your specialization must convert that to your native data type. An outline of a custom scalar type looks like:
using llvm::yaml::ScalarTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
template <>
struct ScalarTraits<MyCustomType> {
static void output(const MyCustomType &value, void*,
llvm::raw_ostream &out) {
out << value; // do custom formatting here
}
static StringRef input(StringRef scalar, void*, MyCustomType &value) {
// do custom parsing here. Return the empty string on success,
// or an error message on failure.
return StringRef();
}
// Determine if this scalar needs quotes.
static bool mustQuote(StringRef) { return true; }
};YAML block scalars are string literals that are represented in YAML using the literal block notation, just like the example shown below:
text: |
First line
Second lineThe YAML I/O library provides support for translating between YAML block scalars and specific C++ types by allowing you to specialize BlockScalarTraits<> on your data type. The library doesn't provide any built-in support for block scalar I/O for types like std::string and llvm::StringRef as they are already supported by YAML I/O and use the ordinary scalar notation by default.
BlockScalarTraits specializations are very similar to the ScalarTraits specialization - YAML I/O will provide the native type and your specialization must create a temporary llvm::StringRef when writing, and it will also provide an llvm::StringRef that has the value of that block scalar and your specialization must convert that to your native data type when reading. An example of a custom type with an appropriate specialization of BlockScalarTraits is shown below:
using llvm::yaml::BlockScalarTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
struct MyStringType {
std::string Str;
};
template <>
struct BlockScalarTraits<MyStringType> {
static void output(const MyStringType &Value, void *Ctxt,
llvm::raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << Value.Str;
}
static StringRef input(StringRef Scalar, void *Ctxt,
MyStringType &Value) {
Value.Str = Scalar.str();
return StringRef();
}
};To be translated to or from a YAML mapping for your type T you must specialize llvm::yaml::MappingTraits on T and implement the "void mapping(IO &io, T&)" method. If your native data structures use pointers to a class everywhere, you can specialize on the class pointer. Examples:
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
// Example of struct Foo which is used by value
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Foo> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Foo &foo) {
io.mapOptional("size", foo.size);
...
}
};
// Example of struct Bar which is natively always a pointer
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Bar*> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Bar *&bar) {
io.mapOptional("size", bar->size);
...
}
};The mapping() method is responsible, if needed, for normalizing and denormalizing. In a simple case where the native data structure requires no normalization, the mapping method just uses mapOptional() or mapRequired() to bind the struct's fields to YAML key names. For example:
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Person> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Person &info) {
io.mapRequired("name", info.name);
io.mapOptional("hat-size", info.hatSize);
}
};When [de]normalization is required, the mapping() method needs a way to access normalized values as fields. To help with this, there is a template MappingNormalization<> which you can then use to automatically do the normalization and denormalization. The template is used to create a local variable in your mapping() method which contains the normalized keys.
Suppose you have native data type Polar which specifies a position in polar coordinates (distance, angle):
struct Polar {
float distance;
float angle;
};but you've decided the normalized YAML for should be in x,y coordinates. That is, you want the yaml to look like:
x: 10.3
y: -4.7You can support this by defining a MappingTraits that normalizes the polar coordinates to x,y coordinates when writing YAML and denormalizes x,y coordinates into polar when reading YAML.
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Polar> {
class NormalizedPolar {
public:
NormalizedPolar(IO &io)
: x(0.0), y(0.0) {
}
NormalizedPolar(IO &, Polar &polar)
: x(polar.distance * cos(polar.angle)),
y(polar.distance * sin(polar.angle)) {
}
Polar denormalize(IO &) {
return Polar(sqrt(x*x+y*y), arctan(x,y));
}
float x;
float y;
};
static void mapping(IO &io, Polar &polar) {
MappingNormalization<NormalizedPolar, Polar> keys(io, polar);
io.mapRequired("x", keys->x);
io.mapRequired("y", keys->y);
}
};When writing YAML, the local variable "keys" will be a stack allocated instance of NormalizedPolar, constructed from the supplied polar object which initializes it x and y fields. The mapRequired() methods then write out the x and y values as key/value pairs.
When reading YAML, the local variable "keys" will be a stack allocated instance of NormalizedPolar, constructed by the empty constructor. The mapRequired methods will find the matching key in the YAML document and fill in the x and y fields of the NormalizedPolar object keys. At the end of the mapping() method when the local keys variable goes out of scope, the denormalize() method will automatically be called to convert the read values back to polar coordinates, and then assigned back to the second parameter to mapping().
In some cases, the normalized class may be a subclass of the native type and could be returned by the denormalize() method, except that the temporary normalized instance is stack allocated. In these cases, the utility template MappingNormalizationHeap<> can be used instead. It just like MappingNormalization<> except that it heap allocates the normalized object when reading YAML. It never destroys the normalized object. The denormalize() method can this return "this".
Within a mapping() method, calls to io.mapRequired() mean that that key is required to exist when parsing YAML documents, otherwise YAML I/O will issue an error.
On the other hand, keys registered with io.mapOptional() are allowed to not exist in the YAML document being read. So what value is put in the field for those optional keys? There are two steps to how those optional fields are filled in. First, the second parameter to the mapping() method is a reference to a native class. That native class must have a default constructor. Whatever value the default constructor initially sets for an optional field will be that field's value. Second, the mapOptional() method has an optional third parameter. If provided it is the value that mapOptional() should set that field to if the YAML document does not have that key.
There is one important difference between those two ways (default constructor and third parameter to mapOptional). When YAML I/O generates a YAML document, if the mapOptional() third parameter is used, if the actual value being written is the same as (using ==) the default value, then that key/value is not written.
When writing out a YAML document, the keys are written in the order that the calls to mapRequired()/mapOptional() are made in the mapping() method. This gives you a chance to write the fields in an order that a human reader of the YAML document would find natural. This may be different that the order of the fields in the native class.
When reading in a YAML document, the keys in the document can be in any order, but they are processed in the order that the calls to mapRequired()/mapOptional() are made in the mapping() method. That enables some interesting functionality. For instance, if the first field bound is the cpu and the second field bound is flags, and the flags are cpu specific, you can programmatically switch how the flags are converted to and from YAML based on the cpu. This works for both reading and writing. For example:
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
struct Info {
CPUs cpu;
uint32_t flags;
};
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Info> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Info &info) {
io.mapRequired("cpu", info.cpu);
// flags must come after cpu for this to work when reading yaml
if ( info.cpu == cpu_x86_64 )
io.mapRequired("flags", *(My86_64Flags*)info.flags);
else
io.mapRequired("flags", *(My86Flags*)info.flags);
}
};The YAML syntax supports tags as a way to specify the type of a node before it is parsed. This allows dynamic types of nodes. But the YAML I/O model uses static typing, so there are limits to how you can use tags with the YAML I/O model. Recently, we added support to YAML I/O for checking/setting the optional tag on a map. Using this functionality it is even possbile to support different mappings, as long as they are convertable.
To check a tag, inside your mapping() method you can use io.mapTag() to specify what the tag should be. This will also add that tag when writing yaml.
Sometimes in a yaml map, each key/value pair is valid, but the combination is
not. This is similar to something having no syntax errors, but still having
semantic errors. To support semantic level checking, YAML I/O allows
an optional validate() method in a MappingTraits template specialization.
When parsing yaml, the validate() method is call after all key/values in
the map have been processed. Any error message returned by the validate()
method during input will be printed just a like a syntax error would be printed.
When writing yaml, the validate() method is called before the yaml
key/values are written. Any error during output will trigger an assert()
because it is a programming error to have invalid struct values.
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
struct Stuff {
...
};
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Stuff> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Stuff &stuff) {
...
}
static StringRef validate(IO &io, Stuff &stuff) {
// Look at all fields in 'stuff' and if there
// are any bad values return a string describing
// the error. Otherwise return an empty string.
return StringRef();
}
};A YAML "flow mapping" is a mapping that uses the inline notation (e.g { x: 1, y: 0 } ) when written to YAML. To specify that a type should be written in YAML using flow mapping, your MappingTraits specialization should add "static const bool flow = true;". For instance:
using llvm::yaml::MappingTraits;
using llvm::yaml::IO;
struct Stuff {
...
};
template <>
struct MappingTraits<Stuff> {
static void mapping(IO &io, Stuff &stuff) {
...
}
static const bool flow = true;
}Flow mappings are subject to line wrapping according to the Output object configuration.
To be translated to or from a YAML sequence for your type T you must specialize
llvm::yaml::SequenceTraits on T and implement two methods:
size_t size(IO &io, T&) and
T::value_type& element(IO &io, T&, size_t indx). For example:
template <>
struct SequenceTraits<MySeq> {
static size_t size(IO &io, MySeq &list) { ... }
static MySeqEl &element(IO &io, MySeq &list, size_t index) { ... }
};The size() method returns how many elements are currently in your sequence. The element() method returns a reference to the i'th element in the sequence. When parsing YAML, the element() method may be called with an index one bigger than the current size. Your element() method should allocate space for one more element (using default constructor if element is a C++ object) and returns a reference to that new allocated space.
A YAML "flow sequence" is a sequence that when written to YAML it uses the inline notation (e.g [ foo, bar ] ). To specify that a sequence type should be written in YAML as a flow sequence, your SequenceTraits specialization should add "static const bool flow = true;". For instance:
template <>
struct SequenceTraits<MyList> {
static size_t size(IO &io, MyList &list) { ... }
static MyListEl &element(IO &io, MyList &list, size_t index) { ... }
// The existence of this member causes YAML I/O to use a flow sequence
static const bool flow = true;
};With the above, if you used MyList as the data type in your native data structures, then when converted to YAML, a flow sequence of integers will be used (e.g. [ 10, -3, 4 ]).
Flow sequences are subject to line wrapping according to the Output object configuration.
Since a common source of sequences is std::vector<>, YAML I/O provides macros: LLVM_YAML_IS_SEQUENCE_VECTOR() and LLVM_YAML_IS_FLOW_SEQUENCE_VECTOR() which can be used to easily specify SequenceTraits<> on a std::vector type. YAML I/O does not partial specialize SequenceTraits on std::vector<> because that would force all vectors to be sequences. An example use of the macros:
std::vector<MyType1>;
std::vector<MyType2>;
LLVM_YAML_IS_SEQUENCE_VECTOR(MyType1)
LLVM_YAML_IS_FLOW_SEQUENCE_VECTOR(MyType2)YAML allows you to define multiple "documents" in a single YAML file. Each new document starts with a left aligned "---" token. The end of all documents is denoted with a left aligned "..." token. Many users of YAML will never have need for multiple documents. The top level node in their YAML schema will be a mapping or sequence. For those cases, the following is not needed. But for cases where you do want multiple documents, you can specify a trait for you document list type. The trait has the same methods as SequenceTraits but is named DocumentListTraits. For example:
template <>
struct DocumentListTraits<MyDocList> {
static size_t size(IO &io, MyDocList &list) { ... }
static MyDocType element(IO &io, MyDocList &list, size_t index) { ... }
};When an llvm::yaml::Input or llvm::yaml::Output object is created their constructors take an optional "context" parameter. This is a pointer to whatever state information you might need.
For instance, in a previous example we showed how the conversion type for a flags field could be determined at runtime based on the value of another field in the mapping. But what if an inner mapping needs to know some field value of an outer mapping? That is where the "context" parameter comes in. You can set values in the context in the outer map's mapping() method and retrieve those values in the inner map's mapping() method.
The context value is just a void*. All your traits which use the context and operate on your native data types, need to agree what the context value actually is. It could be a pointer to an object or struct which your various traits use to shared context sensitive information.
The llvm::yaml::Output class is used to generate a YAML document from your in-memory data structures, using traits defined on your data types. To instantiate an Output object you need an llvm::raw_ostream, an optional context pointer and an optional wrapping column:
class Output : public IO {
public:
Output(llvm::raw_ostream &, void *context = NULL, int WrapColumn = 70);Once you have an Output object, you can use the C++ stream operator on it
to write your native data as YAML. One thing to recall is that a YAML file
can contain multiple "documents". If the top level data structure you are
streaming as YAML is a mapping, scalar, or sequence, then Output assumes you
are generating one document and wraps the mapping output
with "---" and trailing "...".
The WrapColumn parameter will cause the flow mappings and sequences to line-wrap when they go over the supplied column. Pass 0 to completely suppress the wrapping.
using llvm::yaml::Output;
void dumpMyMapDoc(const MyMapType &info) {
Output yout(llvm::outs());
yout << info;
}The above could produce output like:
---
name: Tom
hat-size: 7
...On the other hand, if the top level data structure you are streaming as YAML has a DocumentListTraits specialization, then Output walks through each element of your DocumentList and generates a "---" before the start of each element and ends with a "...".
using llvm::yaml::Output;
void dumpMyMapDoc(const MyDocListType &docList) {
Output yout(llvm::outs());
yout << docList;
}The above could produce output like:
---
name: Tom
hat-size: 7
---
name: Tom
shoe-size: 11
...The llvm::yaml::Input class is used to parse YAML document(s) into your native data structures. To instantiate an Input object you need a StringRef to the entire YAML file, and optionally a context pointer:
class Input : public IO {
public:
Input(StringRef inputContent, void *context=NULL);Once you have an Input object, you can use the C++ stream operator to read the document(s). If you expect there might be multiple YAML documents in one file, you'll need to specialize DocumentListTraits on a list of your document type and stream in that document list type. Otherwise you can just stream in the document type. Also, you can check if there was any syntax errors in the YAML be calling the error() method on the Input object. For example:
// Reading a single document
using llvm::yaml::Input;
Input yin(mb.getBuffer());
// Parse the YAML file
MyDocType theDoc;
yin >> theDoc;
// Check for error
if ( yin.error() )
return;// Reading multiple documents in one file
using llvm::yaml::Input;
LLVM_YAML_IS_DOCUMENT_LIST_VECTOR(std::vector<MyDocType>)
Input yin(mb.getBuffer());
// Parse the YAML file
std::vector<MyDocType> theDocList;
yin >> theDocList;
// Check for error
if ( yin.error() )
return;