Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problems in Eval #2

Closed
fybgogogo opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Problems in Eval #2

fybgogogo opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@fybgogogo
Copy link

I think there is an issue with my training results. The output after eval is completely different from the result of tumor segmentation, but I don't know what the problem is with my operation. In outputs, there are basically only some white dots, and the desired results cannot be seen.
1
2

@billhhh
Copy link
Owner

billhhh commented Jun 11, 2024

Hello, can you try the samples from training set, see if it is well trained?
Also, may I know if all cases perfom the same in the evaluation set?

Another thing you can try is to train more iterations, see if it helps.

@billhhh
Copy link
Owner

billhhh commented Jun 11, 2024

Oh, I think I know the reason: If you only trained 80000 iters with full modalities and eval with the default eval.sh, as now the model only see full modalities, but in the eval.sh, only --mode=1 is available by default, there is a gap between training and testing. So you either evaluate the model with --mode=0,1,2,3 now or you need to complete the other random drop modality training and evaluate the model again. To evaluate all different combination as in the paper, you should finish the random drop training.

@fybgogogo
Copy link
Author

Thank you. I have obtained the segmentation result according to your method.

@billhhh billhhh closed this as completed Jun 12, 2024
@billhhh
Copy link
Owner

billhhh commented Jun 12, 2024

cool

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants