You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I post this for a friend of mine. She tried to do by herself. However it was not working.
She downloaded your Block DX 1.9.2 Client for Linux:
When checking BLOCK-DX-1.9.2.-linux-x64.tar.gz download with sha512sum the following checksum is generated: 041e741cc5f94a398e67246c521e9f4a3d5d6201a2348b1d596562fe2f7c9af912b5f28587a6109f6ba01e04331fb44fb2a85ab1f6d436a433379aba6b94960d
When doing the same with Block-DX-1.9.2-linux-x86-64.AppImage with Checksum 512, she gets:
I'm having the same issue for macOS. Sha512 sum for BLOCK-DX-1.9.5-mac.dmg as generated at the terminal using this command shasum -a512 BLOCK-DX-1.9.5-mac.dmg is
510ae9cb415d9d6d8bbe232a8184684db5cd9b75f5e8156f9c89ab65fe2db7805a6efcdf5d9b51c03b1dee7d539086d6d26222390dba7cd34d258c9d09c39e07 but the yml file is showing value of UQrpy0FdnW2LviMqgYRoTbXNm3X16BVvnImrZf4tt4BabvzfXZtRwDsd7n1TkIbW0mIiOQ26fNNNJYydCcOeBw==
Hello, I post this for a friend of mine. She tried to do by herself. However it was not working.
She downloaded your Block DX 1.9.2 Client for Linux:
When checking BLOCK-DX-1.9.2.-linux-x64.tar.gz download with sha512sum the following checksum is generated: 041e741cc5f94a398e67246c521e9f4a3d5d6201a2348b1d596562fe2f7c9af912b5f28587a6109f6ba01e04331fb44fb2a85ab1f6d436a433379aba6b94960d
When doing the same with Block-DX-1.9.2-linux-x86-64.AppImage with Checksum 512, she gets:
bb574460619640d0c4dc9fdb1113952c34c9394188573280bf724c2c8100498c74773e4c0e02da35fa3757a3a816e65f9758610925ee9bbe5b35c4e8d145fbd5
However comparing it with your publiced ymls, the checksum for the AppImage version should be:
u1dEYGGWQNDE3J/bEROVLDTJOUGIVzKAv3JMLIEASYx0dz5MDgLaNfo3V6OoFuZfl1hhCSXum75bNcTo0UX71Q== .
For the linux tar.gz Version no checksum is availabe.
Repeating the download on github and /or blockdx.org it stays at the different checksum. Did she do something wrong or is it safe to use?
kind regards
RedIceFlower
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: