-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
Issues: boostorg/pfr
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Difference between
boost::pfr::tuple_element
and std::tuple_element
#105
opened Sep 7, 2022 by
denzor200
Trait to detect an ability to reflect type
enhancement
review-noted
#56
opened Oct 16, 2020 by
apolukhin
Reflecting array members of aggregate structs
duplicate
help wanted
PR with a fix wouod be appreciated
#20
opened Mar 12, 2018 by
willwray
tuple_size_v fails with optional<unique_ptr<...>> field in the structure
#110
opened Nov 30, 2022 by
dragon-dreamer
boost:pfr::io insertion into std::cout works, but std::stringstream does not?
#113
opened Dec 23, 2022 by
janwilmans
Elision Only types can't be reflected in MSVC > 16.28
compiler-or-standard-limitation
There is no known way to solve this issue, as it it either a compiler or C++ limitation
#126
opened May 12, 2023 by
chjanke
PFR doesn't work with
std::vector<std::unique_ptr<T>>
field in C++20
#131
opened Jun 30, 2023 by
denzor200
PFR doesn't work with
std::unique_ptr<T>
field since MSVC v19.25
#132
opened Jul 1, 2023 by
denzor200
Expected to work with Lambdas?
compiler-or-standard-limitation
There is no known way to solve this issue, as it it either a compiler or C++ limitation
#137
opened Sep 6, 2023 by
jonesmz
Compile failed with field typed There is no known way to solve this issue, as it it either a compiler or C++ limitation
duplicate
std::optional<Eigen::Matrix3d>
compiler-or-standard-limitation
#193
opened Nov 27, 2024 by
CHN-beta
Previous Next
ProTip!
Follow long discussions with comments:>50.