-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluating Neural Network model using Errant #16
Comments
Hi, You don't need to be confused because you are correct!
That's all there is to it. :) |
Thank you @chrisjbryant for your support. I have applied
I got the below error: Loading resources...
Processing parallel files... Any suggestions? |
Looks like you forgot to install a spacy model. You need to run |
Thank you, dear. Everything is working well, I have ignored to use it with a virtual environment :) One last favour For W&I+LOCNESS V2.1test set, I got just 'ABCN.test.bea19.orig', corrected sentence isn't an m2 file. Kindly, do you know any way to get the gold M2 for W&I+LOCNESS or how to generate it? |
The gold M2 file for W&I+LOCNESS test is private to prevent people from overfitting to it. Instead, you can submit your corrected W&I+LOCNESS output to Codalab. |
Thank you so mutch ... |
Dear @ALL
I have an overview of your documentation, I'm still confused about how to evaluate my Neural Network model (GEC). As I understood that, I have to translate the test set (correcting), then build a new (M2) file using
errant_parallel
command. The last step is to useerrant_compare
with the span-based correction to getF0.5
score.Is this correct?
What is the optimal way to evaluate my NN model using Errant?
Regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: