-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 202
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ISEA visualization? #218
Comments
I don't know of any plans. Contributions are always welcome—in this case, the original cpp implementation is 1100 lines… it's probably be a tough one! I wonder if ISEA's faces are close to Gray-Fuller? https://observablehq.com/@fil/gray-fuller-grid |
Hi @Fil, beautiful work at the link (!). Yes ISEA is close to Gray-Fuller, and historically it is an evolution from it. I am imagining that is possible to reuse something of D3-geo's implementation of Gray-Fuller to reduce the CPP translation work. (see also some clues here). ... Is it possible to pay someone to do that translation with some help from you? What you or d3-geo-projection suggest as public crowdfunding? Another (besides OSGeo/PROJ/src/projections/isea.cpp) source-codes:
What is ISEA? Good definition, citating the Wikipedia's D. Carr et al. (1997) citation:
So, it is like Gray-Fuller, with an icosahedron holding a planar projection on each face, and using same polyhedron orientation (that seems optimal). But Gray-Fuller's use gnomonic projection (near but not equal-area), while ISEA use Lambert azimuthal (precise equal-area). A big difference when we think that equal-area is very important for DGGS. See also ISEA/Dymaxion comparison here. |
Thanks for the links. I hadn't stumbled on Barnes, 2019 yet. A recent resource is https://brsr.github.io/2021/08/31/snyder-equal-area.html which presents compact formulas for ISEA. Note that the Gray-Fuller projection is not gnomonic. Its equations are published in Gray, 1995 and re-implemented (with a free/libre licence) in https://observablehq.com/@fil/buckminster-fullers-triangle-transformation. |
The most cited projection for DGGS (the new ISO 19170-1:2021 standard — also an OGC standard) is ISEA, Icosahedral Snyder Equal Area.
PROJ is providing it as operations/projections/ISEA, is perhaps the main reference as "standard ISEA" for open-source implementations.
Is there a D3-geo-projection plan for ISEA implementation? Seems that it can be classified as an polyhedral-projection.
See also PostGIS/QGIS problem with ISEA visualization.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: