-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider adding maintainers #58
Comments
I'm sure it's no secret at this point that i effectively abandoned egg-mode once i started taking on rustdoc (and later docs.rs) work more and more. The code has rotted somewhat, but i'm still happy with what i've written. I must admit i was slightly hoping someone else would pick up with a new crate, or that the competition between Twitter crates had continued in a similar state to where it was when i first started egg-mode, but it's clear that it's become a community favorite, with new users regularly trying it out. It's the most responsible thing to do to turn over ownership. To put it bluntly, i don't have the energy to work on this crate in addition to my dayjob and my responsibilities to the rust project as Rustdoc Team lead. I've invited @adwhit as a repo owner, since they have a good amount of experience with the code as the author of #40. Other potential collaborators are welcome at their discretion. In terms of immediate goals, i guess i have this basic priority list:
I'm confident that the community can continue to push the crate to the level of quality i always wanted for it. Thank you all for your appreciation over the years, and for your patience after i moved on. Here's to the future! 🎉 |
Thanks for your hard work! I've got plenty of good use out of this crate in the past, looking forward to taking it further. |
Seems like development on this library has stalled. Not a big deal, it's open-source, it happens sometimes. However I think this is the most comprehensive Rust twitter library on
crates.io
, and based on the stars and PRs I'm sure the community would be interested in maintaining it - I certainly would. Would you consider adding some other maintainers to help work towards a 1.0 release?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: