Extraction of companion objects

[jad-hamza]

object SI_NodesRegistry {
  case class Test()
  def test() = Test
}

In the last line, I should have written Test() (then everything is good). However, if I forget the parentheses, I obtain an internal error:

Missing some nodes in Registry: Test$1

[mantognini]

I guess this code should be rejected. The parentheses-less version corresponds to returning the case class companion object.

[samarion]

I'm not sure it would make sense to reject this. If the companion object was actually user-defined, it would make sense to extract it and refer to it in this manner. What we could support is extracting the default companion object of case classes (though I'm not exactly sure what interface we want to give it...)

…

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Marco Antognini ***@***.***> wrote: I guess this code should be rejected. The parentheses-less version corresponds to returning the case class companion object. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#100 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADKzhPC8Ly9t_AH8HT5aFFHhobGlr8kVks5s0uhBgaJpZM4QX0tE> .