Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove COObject.name #70

Open
qmathe opened this issue Sep 30, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Remove COObject.name #70

qmathe opened this issue Sep 30, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@qmathe
Copy link
Member

qmathe commented Sep 30, 2016

Since we have COPersistentRoot.name for naming documents, COObject.name could be removed.

COObject subentities could declare a name property if they need one. We could still keep COObject.displayName and document as overridable in subclasses if we feel like it.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 9, 2016

It looks like -displayName simply returns -name. So if -name is removed but -displayName is not then what would -displayName return?

@ericwa
Copy link
Member

ericwa commented Oct 9, 2016

I guess displayName would be removed as well?

@qmathe
Copy link
Member Author

qmathe commented Oct 10, 2016

Agreed, removing -displayName sounds good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants