From 06734e3c95a34e4d71342f0583f1bb88c61ed9b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Keyur Patel Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:44:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] xfs: Couple of typo fixes in comments ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:56: unnecssary ==> unnecessary ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:59: behavour ==> behaviour ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:206: unitialized ==> uninitialized Signed-off-by: Keyur Patel Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong --- fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c index 6f84ea85fdd837..5c93e8e6de745b 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c @@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ xfs_inobp_check( * If the readahead buffer is invalid, we need to mark it with an error and * clear the DONE status of the buffer so that a followup read will re-read it * from disk. We don't report the error otherwise to avoid warnings during log - * recovery and we don't get unnecssary panics on debug kernels. We use EIO here + * recovery and we don't get unnecessary panics on debug kernels. We use EIO here * because all we want to do is say readahead failed; there is no-one to report * the error to, so this will distinguish it from a non-ra verifier failure. - * Changes to this readahead error behavour also need to be reflected in + * Changes to this readahead error behaviour also need to be reflected in * xfs_dquot_buf_readahead_verify(). */ static void @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ xfs_inode_from_disk( /* * First get the permanent information that is needed to allocate an * inode. If the inode is unused, mode is zero and we shouldn't mess - * with the unitialized part of it. + * with the uninitialized part of it. */ to->di_flushiter = be16_to_cpu(from->di_flushiter); inode->i_generation = be32_to_cpu(from->di_gen);