Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancies in website and Docker requests #7

Closed
mauvehed opened this issue Feb 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Discrepancies in website and Docker requests #7

mauvehed opened this issue Feb 26, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@mauvehed
Copy link

While attempting to use the docker image to query CVE’s, I’m finding some very strange discrepancies between what that shows and the website.

Take for instance CVE-2022-4257. The website shows a resource for exploitation and and exploit.

However, the Docker query shows an exploit, but no exploitation.

docker run inthewild/inthewild reports CVE-2022-4257 --no-format-cli | jq
{
  "id": "CVE-2022-4257",
  "description": "A vulnerability was found in C-DATA Web Management System. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file cgi-bin/jumpto.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument hostname leads to argument injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-214631.",
  "exploitations": [],
  "exploits": [
    {
      "id": "CVE-2022-4257",
      "referenceURL": "https://github.com/siriuswhiter/VulnHub/blob/main/C-Data/rce1.md",
      "timeStamp": "2022-12-05T18:51:00.000Z"
    }
  ]
}

Another issue is with CVE-2022-47986. The website shows two exploitation notes and one exploit. However, the Docker lookup says it doesn’t have a description or anything.

docker run inthewild/inthewild reports CVE-2022-47986 --no-format-cli | jq
{
  "id": "CVE-2022-47986",
  "description": "Vulnerability description missing",
  "exploitations": [],
  "exploits": []
}
@gmatuz
Copy link
Owner

gmatuz commented Jun 19, 2023

fixed, the update logic to the repository was broken 😱

@gmatuz gmatuz closed this as completed Jun 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants