Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
514 lines (358 loc) · 16.2 KB

多线程训练营资料1.xls.md

File metadata and controls

514 lines (358 loc) · 16.2 KB

CAS

Compare And Swap (Compare And Exchange) / 自旋 / 自旋锁 / 无锁

因为经常配合循环操作,直到完成为止,所以泛指一类操作

cas(v, a, b) ,变量v,期待值a, 修改值b

ABA问题,你的女朋友在离开你的这段儿时间经历了别的人,自旋就是你空转等待,一直等到她接纳你为止

解决办法(版本号 AtomicStampedReference),基础类型简单值不需要版本号

Unsafe

AtomicInteger:

public final int incrementAndGet() {
        for (;;) {
            int current = get();
            int next = current + 1;
            if (compareAndSet(current, next))
                return next;
        }
    }

public final boolean compareAndSet(int expect, int update) {
        return unsafe.compareAndSwapInt(this, valueOffset, expect, update);
    }

Unsafe:

public final native boolean compareAndSwapInt(Object var1, long var2, int var4, int var5);

运用:

package com.mashibing.jol;

import sun.misc.Unsafe;

import java.lang.reflect.Field;

public class T02_TestUnsafe {

    int i = 0;
    private static T02_TestUnsafe t = new T02_TestUnsafe();

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
        //Unsafe unsafe = Unsafe.getUnsafe();

        Field unsafeField = Unsafe.class.getDeclaredFields()[0];
        unsafeField.setAccessible(true);
        Unsafe unsafe = (Unsafe) unsafeField.get(null);

        Field f = T02_TestUnsafe.class.getDeclaredField("i");
        long offset = unsafe.objectFieldOffset(f);
        System.out.println(offset);

        boolean success = unsafe.compareAndSwapInt(t, offset, 0, 1);
        System.out.println(success);
        System.out.println(t.i);
        //unsafe.compareAndSwapInt()
    }
}

jdk8u: unsafe.cpp:

cmpxchg = compare and exchange

UNSAFE_ENTRY(jboolean, Unsafe_CompareAndSwapInt(JNIEnv *env, jobject unsafe, jobject obj, jlong offset, jint e, jint x))
  UnsafeWrapper("Unsafe_CompareAndSwapInt");
  oop p = JNIHandles::resolve(obj);
  jint* addr = (jint *) index_oop_from_field_offset_long(p, offset);
  return (jint)(Atomic::cmpxchg(x, addr, e)) == e;
UNSAFE_END

jdk8u: atomic_linux_x86.inline.hpp

is_MP = Multi Processor

inline jint     Atomic::cmpxchg    (jint     exchange_value, volatile jint*     dest, jint     compare_value) {
  int mp = os::is_MP();
  __asm__ volatile (LOCK_IF_MP(%4) "cmpxchgl %1,(%3)"
                    : "=a" (exchange_value)
                    : "r" (exchange_value), "a" (compare_value), "r" (dest), "r" (mp)
                    : "cc", "memory");
  return exchange_value;
}

jdk8u: os.hpp is_MP()

  static inline bool is_MP() {
    // During bootstrap if _processor_count is not yet initialized
    // we claim to be MP as that is safest. If any platform has a
    // stub generator that might be triggered in this phase and for
    // which being declared MP when in fact not, is a problem - then
    // the bootstrap routine for the stub generator needs to check
    // the processor count directly and leave the bootstrap routine
    // in place until called after initialization has ocurred.
    return (_processor_count != 1) || AssumeMP;
  }

jdk8u: atomic_linux_x86.inline.hpp

#define LOCK_IF_MP(mp) "cmp $0, " #mp "; je 1f; lock; 1: "

最终实现:

cmpxchg = cas修改变量值

lock cmpxchg 指令

硬件:

lock指令在执行后面指令的时候锁定一个北桥信号

(不采用锁总线的方式)

markword

工具:JOL = Java Object Layout

<dependencies>
        <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.openjdk.jol/jol-core -->
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.openjdk.jol</groupId>
            <artifactId>jol-core</artifactId>
            <version>0.9</version>
        </dependency>
    </dependencies>

jdk8u: markOop.hpp

// Bit-format of an object header (most significant first, big endian layout below):
//
//  32 bits:
//  --------
//             hash:25 ------------>| age:4    biased_lock:1 lock:2 (normal object)
//             JavaThread*:23 epoch:2 age:4    biased_lock:1 lock:2 (biased object)
//             size:32 ------------------------------------------>| (CMS free block)
//             PromotedObject*:29 ---------->| promo_bits:3 ----->| (CMS promoted object)
//
//  64 bits:
//  --------
//  unused:25 hash:31 -->| unused:1   age:4    biased_lock:1 lock:2 (normal object)
//  JavaThread*:54 epoch:2 unused:1   age:4    biased_lock:1 lock:2 (biased object)
//  PromotedObject*:61 --------------------->| promo_bits:3 ----->| (CMS promoted object)
//  size:64 ----------------------------------------------------->| (CMS free block)
//
//  unused:25 hash:31 -->| cms_free:1 age:4    biased_lock:1 lock:2 (COOPs && normal object)
//  JavaThread*:54 epoch:2 cms_free:1 age:4    biased_lock:1 lock:2 (COOPs && biased object)
//  narrowOop:32 unused:24 cms_free:1 unused:4 promo_bits:3 ----->| (COOPs && CMS promoted object)
//  unused:21 size:35 -->| cms_free:1 unused:7 ------------------>| (COOPs && CMS free block)

synchronized的横切面详解

  1. synchronized原理
  2. 升级过程
  3. 汇编实现
  4. vs reentrantLock的区别

java源码层级

synchronized(o)

字节码层级

monitorenter moniterexit

JVM层级(Hotspot)

package com.mashibing.insidesync;

import org.openjdk.jol.info.ClassLayout;

public class T01_Sync1 {
  

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Object o = new Object();

        System.out.println(ClassLayout.parseInstance(o).toPrintable());
    }
}
com.mashibing.insidesync.T01_Sync1$Lock object internals:
 OFFSET  SIZE   TYPE DESCRIPTION                               VALUE
      0     4   (object header)  05 00 00 00 (00000101 00000000 00000000 00000000) (5)
      4     4   (object header)  00 00 00 00 (00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000) (0)
      8     4   (object header)  49 ce 00 20 (01001001 11001110 00000000 00100000) (536923721)
     12     4        (loss due to the next object alignment)
Instance size: 16 bytes
Space losses: 0 bytes internal + 4 bytes external = 4 bytes total
com.mashibing.insidesync.T02_Sync2$Lock object internals:
 OFFSET  SIZE   TYPE DESCRIPTION                               VALUE
      0     4   (object header)  05 90 2e 1e (00000101 10010000 00101110 00011110) (506368005)
      4     4   (object header)  1b 02 00 00 (00011011 00000010 00000000 00000000) (539)
      8     4   (object header)  49 ce 00 20 (01001001 11001110 00000000 00100000) (536923721)
     12     4        (loss due to the next object alignment)
Instance size: 16 bytes
Space losses: 0 bytes internal + 4 bytes external = 4 bytes tota

InterpreterRuntime:: monitorenter方法

IRT_ENTRY_NO_ASYNC(void, InterpreterRuntime::monitorenter(JavaThread* thread, BasicObjectLock* elem))
#ifdef ASSERT
  thread->last_frame().interpreter_frame_verify_monitor(elem);
#endif
  if (PrintBiasedLockingStatistics) {
    Atomic::inc(BiasedLocking::slow_path_entry_count_addr());
  }
  Handle h_obj(thread, elem->obj());
  assert(Universe::heap()->is_in_reserved_or_null(h_obj()),
         "must be NULL or an object");
  if (UseBiasedLocking) {
    // Retry fast entry if bias is revoked to avoid unnecessary inflation
    ObjectSynchronizer::fast_enter(h_obj, elem->lock(), true, CHECK);
  } else {
    ObjectSynchronizer::slow_enter(h_obj, elem->lock(), CHECK);
  }
  assert(Universe::heap()->is_in_reserved_or_null(elem->obj()),
         "must be NULL or an object");
#ifdef ASSERT
  thread->last_frame().interpreter_frame_verify_monitor(elem);
#endif
IRT_END

synchronizer.cpp

revoke_and_rebias

void ObjectSynchronizer::fast_enter(Handle obj, BasicLock* lock, bool attempt_rebias, TRAPS) {
 if (UseBiasedLocking) {
    if (!SafepointSynchronize::is_at_safepoint()) {
      BiasedLocking::Condition cond = BiasedLocking::revoke_and_rebias(obj, attempt_rebias, THREAD);
      if (cond == BiasedLocking::BIAS_REVOKED_AND_REBIASED) {
        return;
      }
    } else {
      assert(!attempt_rebias, "can not rebias toward VM thread");
      BiasedLocking::revoke_at_safepoint(obj);
    }
    assert(!obj->mark()->has_bias_pattern(), "biases should be revoked by now");
 }

 slow_enter (obj, lock, THREAD) ;
}
void ObjectSynchronizer::slow_enter(Handle obj, BasicLock* lock, TRAPS) {
  markOop mark = obj->mark();
  assert(!mark->has_bias_pattern(), "should not see bias pattern here");

  if (mark->is_neutral()) {
    // Anticipate successful CAS -- the ST of the displaced mark must
    // be visible <= the ST performed by the CAS.
    lock->set_displaced_header(mark);
    if (mark == (markOop) Atomic::cmpxchg_ptr(lock, obj()->mark_addr(), mark)) {
      TEVENT (slow_enter: release stacklock) ;
      return ;
    }
    // Fall through to inflate() ...
  } else
  if (mark->has_locker() && THREAD->is_lock_owned((address)mark->locker())) {
    assert(lock != mark->locker(), "must not re-lock the same lock");
    assert(lock != (BasicLock*)obj->mark(), "don't relock with same BasicLock");
    lock->set_displaced_header(NULL);
    return;
  }

#if 0
  // The following optimization isn't particularly useful.
  if (mark->has_monitor() && mark->monitor()->is_entered(THREAD)) {
    lock->set_displaced_header (NULL) ;
    return ;
  }
#endif

  // The object header will never be displaced to this lock,
  // so it does not matter what the value is, except that it
  // must be non-zero to avoid looking like a re-entrant lock,
  // and must not look locked either.
  lock->set_displaced_header(markOopDesc::unused_mark());
  ObjectSynchronizer::inflate(THREAD, obj())->enter(THREAD);
}

inflate方法:膨胀为重量级锁

锁升级过程

JDK8 markword实现表:

markword

无锁 - 偏向锁 - 轻量级锁 (自旋锁,自适应自旋)- 重量级锁

synchronized优化的过程和markword息息相关

用markword中最低的三位代表锁状态 其中1位是偏向锁位 两位是普通锁位

  1. Object o = new Object() 锁 = 0 01 无锁态

  2. o.hashCode() 001 + hashcode

    00000001 10101101 00110100 00110110
    01011001 00000000 00000000 00000000

    little endian big endian

    00000000 00000000 00000000 01011001 00110110 00110100 10101101 00000000

  3. 默认synchronized(o) 00 -> 轻量级锁 默认情况 偏向锁有个时延,默认是4秒 why? 因为JVM虚拟机自己有一些默认启动的线程,里面有好多sync代码,这些sync代码启动时就知道肯定会有竞争,如果使用偏向锁,就会造成偏向锁不断的进行锁撤销和锁升级的操作,效率较低。

    -XX:BiasedLockingStartupDelay=0
  4. 如果设定上述参数 new Object () - > 101 偏向锁 ->线程ID为0 -> Anonymous BiasedLock 打开偏向锁,new出来的对象,默认就是一个可偏向匿名对象101

  5. 如果有线程上锁 上偏向锁,指的就是,把markword的线程ID改为自己线程ID的过程 偏向锁不可重偏向 批量偏向 批量撤销

  6. 如果有线程竞争 撤销偏向锁,升级轻量级锁 线程在自己的线程栈生成LockRecord ,用CAS操作将markword设置为指向自己这个线程的LR的指针,设置成功者得到锁

  7. 如果竞争加剧 竞争加剧:有线程超过10次自旋, -XX:PreBlockSpin, 或者自旋线程数超过CPU核数的一半, 1.6之后,加入自适应自旋 Adapative Self Spinning , JVM自己控制 升级重量级锁:-> 向操作系统申请资源,linux mutex , CPU从3级-0级系统调用,线程挂起,进入等待队列,等待操作系统的调度,然后再映射回用户空间

(以上实验环境是JDK11,打开就是偏向锁,而JDK8默认对象头是无锁)

偏向锁默认是打开的,但是有一个时延,如果要观察到偏向锁,应该设定参数

没错,我就是厕所所长

加锁,指的是锁定对象

锁升级的过程

JDK较早的版本 OS的资源 互斥量 用户态 -> 内核态的转换 重量级 效率比较低

现代版本进行了优化

无锁 - 偏向锁 -轻量级锁(自旋锁)-重量级锁

偏向锁 - markword 上记录当前线程指针,下次同一个线程加锁的时候,不需要争用,只需要判断线程指针是否同一个,所以,偏向锁,偏向加锁的第一个线程 。hashCode备份在线程栈上 线程销毁,锁降级为无锁

有争用 - 锁升级为轻量级锁 - 每个线程有自己的LockRecord在自己的线程栈上,用CAS去争用markword的LR的指针,指针指向哪个线程的LR,哪个线程就拥有锁

自旋超过10次,升级为重量级锁 - 如果太多线程自旋 CPU消耗过大,不如升级为重量级锁,进入等待队列(不消耗CPU)-XX:PreBlockSpin

自旋锁在 JDK1.4.2 中引入,使用 -XX:+UseSpinning 来开启。JDK 6 中变为默认开启,并且引入了自适应的自旋锁(适应性自旋锁)。

自适应自旋锁意味着自旋的时间(次数)不再固定,而是由前一次在同一个锁上的自旋时间及锁的拥有者的状态来决定。如果在同一个锁对象上,自旋等待刚刚成功获得过锁,并且持有锁的线程正在运行中,那么虚拟机就会认为这次自旋也是很有可能再次成功,进而它将允许自旋等待持续相对更长的时间。如果对于某个锁,自旋很少成功获得过,那在以后尝试获取这个锁时将可能省略掉自旋过程,直接阻塞线程,避免浪费处理器资源。

偏向锁由于有锁撤销的过程revoke,会消耗系统资源,所以,在锁争用特别激烈的时候,用偏向锁未必效率高。还不如直接使用轻量级锁。

synchronized最底层实现

public class T {
    static volatile int i = 0;
    
    public static void n() { i++; }
    
    public static synchronized void m() {}
    
    publics static void main(String[] args) {
        for(int j=0; j<1000_000; j++) {
            m();
            n();
        }
    }
}

java -XX:+UnlockDiagonositicVMOptions -XX:+PrintAssembly T

C1 Compile Level 1 (一级优化)

C2 Compile Level 2 (二级优化)

找到m() n()方法的汇编码,会看到 lock comxchg .....指令

synchronized vs Lock (CAS)

 在高争用 高耗时的环境下synchronized效率更高
 在低争用 低耗时的环境下CAS效率更高
 synchronized到重量级之后是等待队列(不消耗CPU)
 CAS(等待期间消耗CPU)
 
 一切以实测为准

锁消除 lock eliminate

public void add(String str1,String str2){
         StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
         sb.append(str1).append(str2);
}

我们都知道 StringBuffer 是线程安全的,因为它的关键方法都是被 synchronized 修饰过的,但我们看上面这段代码,我们会发现,sb 这个引用只会在 add 方法中使用,不可能被其它线程引用(因为是局部变量,栈私有),因此 sb 是不可能共享的资源,JVM 会自动消除 StringBuffer 对象内部的锁。

锁粗化 lock coarsening

public String test(String str){
       
       int i = 0;
       StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer():
       while(i < 100){
           sb.append(str);
           i++;
       }
       return sb.toString():
}

JVM 会检测到这样一连串的操作都对同一个对象加锁(while 循环内 100 次执行 append,没有锁粗化的就要进行 100 次加锁/解锁),此时 JVM 就会将加锁的范围粗化到这一连串的操作的外部(比如 while 虚幻体外),使得这一连串操作只需要加一次锁即可。

锁降级(不重要)

https://www.zhihu.com/question/63859501

其实,只被VMThread访问,降级也就没啥意义了。所以可以简单认为锁降级不存在!

超线程

一个ALU + 两组Registers + PC

参考资料

http://openjdk.java.net/groups/hotspot/docs/HotSpotGlossary.html

强软弱虚

强引用:一般引用

软引用(SoftReference):当内存不足,且发生gc时,被回收。可用于缓存

弱引用(WeakReference):当发生gc时,就会被回收。ThreadLocal的threadLocalMap的key使用了WeakReference。WeakHanshMap

虚引用(PhantomReference):虚引用必须配合ReferenceQueue使用。用于堆外内存的回收。当JVM中Nio使用堆外缓存区,回收时需要回收堆外内存,虚引用可发送一个信号(所以直接内存的分配和回收都是有Unsafe类去操作)