You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
for example if updated, bbcfood now includes coverage for category, cuisine, ratings, ratings_count, dietary_restrictions & keywords with a current pull. These are all covered via schema so they require no update to the scraper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Test coverage can be expanded/reduced without requiring any changes to the source code it references; so initially, yes it seems that it's valid to report changes in coverage despite no modification of the recipe scraper.
In the case of methods that always directly return the result of calling the recipe scraper's superclass method with the same arguments, I think it's debatable whether the test coverage is exercising the scraper (bbcgood in the example here), or the superclass -- or perhaps both?
for example if updated, bbcfood now includes coverage for category, cuisine, ratings, ratings_count, dietary_restrictions & keywords with a current pull. These are all covered via schema so they require no update to the scraper.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: