Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The results are missing a lot of basic co-references ... #290

Open
ohmeow opened this issue Dec 8, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

The results are missing a lot of basic co-references ... #290

ohmeow opened this issue Dec 8, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@ohmeow
Copy link

ohmeow commented Dec 8, 2020

Hi there,

Running this against many trivial examples and it seems to miss obvious co-references ... here's an example of what I mean:

Input: "My dogs love the beach. They really love going there."

Results: The only co-reference it finds is "They" => "My dogs". But it completely misses that "there" => "the beach".

I'm noticing that the model seems to really have issues with correctly resolving what words like "it", "that", "this", and "there" refer too. Is this something with how the model was trained or is there something I can do to tune it to capture those words as well?

Thanks.

@Hevia
Copy link

Hevia commented Apr 6, 2021

Having similar issues, anything we can do to improve performance/fine-tune on our end?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 16, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Apr 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants