This is a fork of dacite
: https://github.com/konradhalas/dacite
This module simplifies creation of data classes (PEP 557) from dictionaries.
To install dacite, simply use pip
:
$ pip install dacite2
Minimum Python version supported by dacite2
is 3.7.
from dataclasses import dataclass
from dacite import from_dict
@dataclass
class User:
name: str
age: int
is_active: bool
data = {
'name': 'John',
'age': 30,
'is_active': True,
}
user = from_dict(data_class=User, data=data)
assert user == User(name='John', age=30, is_active=True)
Dacite supports following features:
- nested structures
- (basic) types checking
- optional fields (i.e.
typing.Optional
) - unions
- forward references
- collections
- custom type hooks
Passing plain dictionaries as a data container between your functions or methods isn't a good practice. Of course you can always create your custom class instead, but this solution is an overkill if you only want to merge a few fields within a single object.
Fortunately Python has a good solution to this problem - data classes.
Thanks to @dataclass
decorator you can easily create a new custom
type with a list of given fields in a declarative manner. Data classes
support type hints by design.
However, even if you are using data classes, you have to create their
instances somehow. In many such cases, your input is a dictionary - it
can be a payload from a HTTP request or a raw data from a database. If
you want to convert those dictionaries into data classes, dacite
is
your best friend.
This library was originally created to simplify creation of type hinted data transfer objects (DTO) which can cross the boundaries in the application architecture.
It's important to mention that dacite
is not a data validation library.
There are dozens of awesome data validation projects and it doesn't make
sense to duplicate this functionality within dacite
. If you want to
validate your data first, you should combine dacite
with one of data
validation library.
Please check Use Case section for a real-life example.
Dacite is based on a single function - dacite.from_dict
. This function
takes 3 parameters:
data_class
- data class typedata
- dictionary of input dataconfig
(optional) - configuration of the creation process, instance ofdacite.Config
class
Configuration is a (data) class with following fields:
type_hooks
cast
forward_references
check_types
strict
strict_unions_match
The examples below show all features of from_dict
function and usage
of all Config
parameters.
You can pass a data with nested dictionaries and it will create a proper result.
@dataclass
class A:
x: str
y: int
@dataclass
class B:
a: A
data = {
'a': {
'x': 'test',
'y': 1,
}
}
result = from_dict(data_class=B, data=data)
assert result == B(a=A(x='test', y=1))
Whenever your data class has a Optional
field and you will not provide
input data for this field, it will take the None
value.
from typing import Optional
@dataclass
class A:
x: str
y: Optional[int]
data = {
'x': 'test',
}
result = from_dict(data_class=A, data=data)
assert result == A(x='test', y=None)
If your field can accept multiple types, you should use Union
. Dacite
will try to match data with provided types one by one. If none will
match, it will raise UnionMatchError
exception.
from typing import Union
@dataclass
class A:
x: str
@dataclass
class B:
y: int
@dataclass
class C:
u: Union[A, B]
data = {
'u': {
'y': 1,
},
}
result = from_dict(data_class=C, data=data)
assert result == C(u=B(y=1))
Dacite supports fields defined as collections. It works for both - basic types and data classes.
@dataclass
class A:
x: str
y: int
@dataclass
class B:
a_list: List[A]
data = {
'a_list': [
{
'x': 'test1',
'y': 1,
},
{
'x': 'test2',
'y': 2,
}
],
}
result = from_dict(data_class=B, data=data)
assert result == B(a_list=[A(x='test1', y=1), A(x='test2', y=2)])
You can use Config.type_hooks
argument if you want to transform the input
data of a data class field with given type into the new value. You have to
pass a mapping of type Mapping[Type, Callable[[Any], Any]
.
@dataclass
class A:
x: str
data = {
'x': 'TEST',
}
result = from_dict(data_class=A, data=data, config=Config(type_hooks={str: str.lower}))
assert result == A(x='test')
If a data class field type is a Optional[T]
you can pass both -
Optional[T]
or just T
- as a key in type_hooks
. The same with generic
collections, e.g. when a field has type List[T]
you can use List[T]
to
transform whole collection or T
to transform each item.
To target all types use Any
. Targeting collections without their sub-types
will target all collections of those types, such as List
and Dict
.
@dataclass
class ShoppingCart:
store: str
item_ids: List[int]
data = {
'store': '7-Eleven',
'item_ids': [1, 2, 3],
}
def print_value(value):
print(value)
return value
def print_collection(collection):
for item in collection:
print(item)
return collection
result = from_dict(
data_class=ShoppingCart,
data=data,
config=Config(
type_hooks={
Any: print_value,
List: print_collection
}
)
)
prints
7-Eleven
[1, 2, 3]
1
2
3
If a data class field type is a Optional[T]
you can pass both -
Optional[T]
or just T
- as a key in type_hooks
. The same with generic
collections, e.g. when a field has type List[T]
you can use List[T]
to
transform whole collection or T
to transform each item.
It's a very common case that you want to create an instance of a field type
from the input data with just calling your type with the input value. Of
course you can use type_hooks={T: T}
to achieve this goal but cast=[T]
is
an easier and more expressive way. It also works with base classes - if T
is a base class of type S
, all fields of type S
will be also "casted".
from enum import Enum
class E(Enum):
X = 'x'
Y = 'y'
Z = 'z'
@dataclass
class A:
e: E
data = {
'e': 'x',
}
result = from_dict(data_class=A, data=data, config=Config(cast=[E]))
# or
result = from_dict(data_class=A, data=data, config=Config(cast=[Enum]))
assert result == A(e=E.X)
Definition of forward references can be passed as a {'name': Type}
mapping to
Config.forward_references
. This dict is passed to typing.get_type_hints()
as the
globalns
param when evaluating each field's type.
@dataclass
class X:
y: "Y"
@dataclass
class Y:
s: str
data = from_dict(X, {"y": {"s": "text"}}, Config(forward_references={"Y": Y}))
assert data == X(Y("text"))
There are rare cases when dacite
built-in type checker can not validate
your types (e.g. custom generic class) or you have such functionality
covered by other library and you don't want to validate your types twice.
In such case you can disable type checking with Config(check_types=False)
.
By default types checking is enabled.
T = TypeVar('T')
class X(Generic[T]):
pass
@dataclass
class A:
x: X[str]
x = X[str]()
assert from_dict(A, {'x': x}, config=Config(check_types=False)) == A(x=x)
By default from_dict
ignores additional keys (not matching data class field)
in the input data. If you want change this behaviour set Config.strict
to
True
. In case of unexpected key from_dict
will raise UnexpectedDataError
exception.
Union
allows to define multiple possible types for a given field. By default
dacite
is trying to find the first matching type for a provided data and it
returns instance of this type. It means that it's possible that there are other
matching types further on the Union
types list. With strict_unions_match
only a single match is allowed, otherwise dacite
raises StrictUnionMatchError
.
Whenever something goes wrong, from_dict
will raise adequate
exception. There are a few of them:
WrongTypeError
- raised when a type of a input value does not match with a type of a data class fieldMissingValueError
- raised when you don't provide a value for a required fieldUnionMatchError
- raised when provided data does not match any type ofUnion
ForwardReferenceError
- raised when undefined forward reference encountered in dataclassUnexpectedDataError
- raised whenstrict
mode is enabled and the input data has not matching keysStrictUnionMatchError
- raised whenstrict_unions_match
mode is enabled and the input data has ambiguousUnion
match
First of all - if you want to submit your pull request, thank you very much! I really appreciate your support.
Please remember that every new feature, bug fix or improvement should be tested. 100% code coverage is a must have.
We are using a few static code analysis tools to increase the code quality
(black
, mypy
, pylint
). Please make sure that you are not generating any
errors/warnings before you submit your PR. You can find current configuration
in .travis.yml
file.
Last but not least, if you want to introduce new feature, please discuss it first within an issue.
Clone dacite
repository:
$ git clone [email protected]:idanmiara/dacite.git
Create and activate virtualenv in the way you like:
$ python3 -m venv dacite-env
$ source dacite-env/bin/activate
Install all dacite
dependencies:
$ pip install -e .[dev]
To run tests you just have to fire:
$ pytest
There are many cases when we receive "raw" data (Python dicts) as a input to our system. HTTP request payload is a very common use case. In most web frameworks we receive request data as a simple dictionary. Instead of passing this dict down to your "business" code, it's a good idea to create something more "robust".
Following example is a simple flask
app - it has single /products
endpoint.
You can use this endpoint to "create" product in your system. Our core
create_product
function expects data class as a parameter. Thanks to dacite
we can easily build such data class from POST
request payload.
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List
from flask import Flask, request, Response
import dacite
app = Flask(__name__)
@dataclass
class ProductVariantData:
code: str
description: str = ''
stock: int = 0
@dataclass
class ProductData:
name: str
price: float
variants: List[ProductVariantData]
def create_product(product_data: ProductData) -> None:
pass # your business logic here
@app.route("/products", methods=['POST'])
def products():
product_data = dacite.from_dict(
data_class=ProductData,
data=request.get_json(),
)
create_product(product_data=product_data)
return Response(status=201)
What if we want to validate our data (e.g. check if code
has 6 characters)?
Such features are out of scope of dacite
but we can easily combine it with
one of data validation library. Let's try with
marshmallow.
First of all we have to define our data validation schemas:
from marshmallow import Schema, fields, ValidationError
def validate_code(code):
if len(code) != 6:
raise ValidationError('Code must have 6 characters.')
class ProductVariantDataSchema(Schema):
code = fields.Str(required=True, validate=validate_code)
description = fields.Str(required=False)
stock = fields.Int(required=False)
class ProductDataSchema(Schema):
name = fields.Str(required=True)
price = fields.Decimal(required=True)
variants = fields.Nested(ProductVariantDataSchema(many=True))
And use them within our endpoint:
@app.route("/products", methods=['POST'])
def products():
schema = ProductDataSchema()
result, errors = schema.load(request.get_json())
if errors:
return Response(
response=json.dumps(errors),
status=400,
mimetype='application/json',
)
product_data = dacite.from_dict(
data_class=ProductData,
data=result,
)
create_product(product_data=product_data)
return Response(status=201)
Still dacite
helps us to create data class from "raw" dict with validated data.
Follow dacite
updates in CHANGELOG.
Created by Konrad Hałas. Maintained by Idan Miara.