Standardize configuration UX #241
Closed
bmcclure
started this conversation in
Ideas / Feature Requests
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I'd totally be interested! The reason why it is how it is today is that this is the way I've came to do it so the meta areas would work. If there's a more compliant way of getting those to work while keeping things standard that would be great! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
This is now the workflow for MA 3.1.0 and over. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I think it would be beneficial if the overall configuration workflow for MA worked more like other integrations. By this, I mean no configuration.yml entry needed and no auto-creation of integrations in the UI.
According to the HA developer docs, integrations should not create themselves, at most they should use discovery to suggest integrations. But I would prefer if MA didn't even do that, because I have a lot of areas and don't necessarily want an integration for each one of those, so they'd just be clutter.
My preferred workflow for MA would be that you just install through HACS and then start adding integrations in the UI for each area you want MA to handle.
This would be in line with other integrations, would eliminate some confusion, would make uninstalling simpler, and could maybe even help pave the way for MA not requiring restarts of HA which would be a dream come true.
I'd be happy to work on this and submit a PR if this is a direction you're interested in going, or at least interested in seeing it in action.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions