Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using strawberry instead of graphene #2

Open
jtratner opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Consider using strawberry instead of graphene #2

jtratner opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@jtratner
Copy link
Owner

jtratner commented Jan 7, 2022

Strawberry looks pretty nice - https://strawberry.rocks/ - seems a little less verbose and more async-friendly than graphene (and possibly has a little bit more development velocity).

There's a direct pydantic adapter (which is nice!) and it's possible it would be easier to manage composition that way, etc.

Unclear about future of graphene-django / graphene / etc so want to leave pointer to strawberry (even though graphene has been super productive!)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant