Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why do you freeze batch norm parameters when training? #18

Open
leao1995 opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Why do you freeze batch norm parameters when training? #18

leao1995 opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@leao1995
Copy link

leao1995 commented Nov 9, 2017

would it be better to let batch norm parameters adapt to your current data?

@leao1995 leao1995 changed the title Why freeze batch norm parameters when training? Why do you freeze batch norm parameters when training? Nov 9, 2017
@xichangzun
Copy link

xichangzun commented Dec 19, 2017

it's a common practice.First, Because the pretrain network's bn layers have been trained. Second,Object Detection 's batchsize is small, hard to make bn parameter stable.

@prakashjayy
Copy link

use Group norm instead of batch norm . it is more stable.

@lxtGH
Copy link

lxtGH commented May 2, 2018

Use synchronized batch normalization

@PhilipMay
Copy link

Use synchronized batch normalization

Using sync batch norm does not help with single GPU training and low batch sizes though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants