Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the ability to support multiple service instances #2028

Open
hamzy opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Add the ability to support multiple service instances #2028

hamzy opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Milestone

Comments

@hamzy
Copy link

hamzy commented Oct 25, 2024

/kind feature
/area provider/ibmcloud

Describe the solution you'd like
A customer is asking for the ability for an OpenShift cluster to be disaster resistant. If a data center goes down then the cluster can still function.

An example of this is to create single master nodes over different zones. For example:
dal10, dal12, and dal13.
We could also spread the worker nodes over the different zones.

The PowerEdgeRouter has the ability to link the VPC along with multiple Service Instances. The only extra thing which would need to happen is to add some more routing to the CoreOS OS. (NOTE: I don't expect IBM CAPI to do this one part)

The IBMPowerVSMachineSpec structure already uses IBMPowerVSResourceReference as the ServiceInstance. I would think that the IBMPowerVSClusterSpec structure should be changed to support an array of IBMPowerVSResourceReference.

Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider labels Oct 25, 2024
@mkumatag mkumatag added this to the Next milestone Oct 29, 2024
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hamzy ,This issue has been brought up for discussion in our community meeting last week, We decided to have a meeting exclusively about this requirement post this current release( We are planning to have v0.9.0 by Nov 15).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/ibmcloud Issues or PRs related to ibmcloud provider kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants