You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The Waffle widget only has a dim parameter which forces dotty or square WafflePixels.
Describe the solution you'd like
Have to ability to size a Waffle as a rectangle in both X and Y dimensions. I have done something similar in one of my own projects:
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have done this in one of my own projects by overriding a couple methods from Waffle and WafflePixel. We could instead add a parameter to the Waffle for the other dimension and refactor WafflePixel to handle both dimensions parameters. dotty would be unaffected by this since it would only use the existing dim parameter.
Additional context
I can propose a PR implementing this feature if this is of interest for the team. Still need to figure out proper parameters implementation for dim_x and dim_y without breaking backwards compatibility. I am guessing we should conserve dim and only add dim_y.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The
Waffle
widget only has adim
parameter which forcesdotty
or square WafflePixels.Describe the solution you'd like
Have to ability to size a
Waffle
as a rectangle in both X and Y dimensions. I have done something similar in one of my own projects:Describe alternatives you've considered
I have done this in one of my own projects by overriding a couple methods from
Waffle
andWafflePixel
. We could instead add a parameter to theWaffle
for the other dimension and refactorWafflePixel
to handle both dimensions parameters.dotty
would be unaffected by this since it would only use the existingdim
parameter.Additional context
I can propose a PR implementing this feature if this is of interest for the team. Still need to figure out proper parameters implementation for
dim_x
anddim_y
without breaking backwards compatibility. I am guessing we should conservedim
and only adddim_y
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: