You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to lancer-data documentation at https://github.com/massif-press/lancer-data#deployables : "A recall value will generate a recall action, removing the deployable from the user's Deployables list and refunding the system the cost value in charges. deactivation does the same as recall but does not refund the charge cost." Per discussion at massif-press/compcon#2298 , deployables without the limited tag should use deactivation, however several instead use recall. Full list that I was able to find is Hive Drone, Sentinel Drone, Tempest Drone, and Assassin Drone.
Hey i wanted to reopen this discussion cuz im finding that a lot of deployables dont have the Limited tag but also dont seem to follow this rule. I wanted some clarifications as to the intended behaviour here.
One example being the Jericho Cover. Its a deployable, can be recalled and redeployed, but has no Limited Tag. Especially confusing since it has two sections of cover that can be recalled individually
According to lancer-data documentation at https://github.com/massif-press/lancer-data#deployables : "A
recall
value will generate a recall action, removing the deployable from the user's Deployables list and refunding the system thecost
value in charges.deactivation
does the same as recall but does not refund the charge cost." Per discussion at massif-press/compcon#2298 , deployables without the limited tag should usedeactivation
, however several instead userecall
. Full list that I was able to find is Hive Drone, Sentinel Drone, Tempest Drone, and Assassin Drone.Hive Drone:
lancer-data/lib/systems.json
Line 1292 in fec5461
Sentinel Drone:
lancer-data/lib/systems.json
Line 1489 in fec5461
Tempest Drone:
lancer-data/lib/systems.json
Line 1607 in fec5461
Assassin Drone:
lancer-data/lib/systems.json
Line 1631 in fec5461
(sorry for the lazy formatting of this report, i've been pressed for time lately and wanted to finally post this since i haven't been able to yet!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: