Config_checks: Missing ! in pin inversion example in Verify endstops

In the "Verify endstops" section there is an example of adding an exclamation point to the pin definition to invert its logic. I believe the intention in the example is to keep the hardware pull-up ^ and follow it with ! to invert the pin logic, but the ! is missing. Signed-off-by: Tom Dunn <[email protected]>
matttss · Oct 19, 2023 · 0c521b6 · 0c521b6
1 parent 593486f
commit 0c521b6
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/docs/Config_checks.md b/docs/Config_checks.md
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ The QUERY_ENDSTOPS command should report the endstop as "TRIGGERED".
 
 If the endstop appears inverted (it reports "open" when triggered and
 vice-versa) then add a "!" to the pin definition (for example,
-"endstop_pin: ^PA2"), or remove the "!" if there is already one
+"endstop_pin: ^!PA2"), or remove the "!" if there is already one
 present.
 
 If the endstop does not change at all then it generally indicates that