Skip to content

Commit 0c521b6

Browse files
Tom DunnKevinOConnor
Tom Dunn
authored andcommitted
Config_checks: Missing ! in pin inversion example in Verify endstops
In the "Verify endstops" section there is an example of adding an exclamation point to the pin definition to invert its logic. I believe the intention in the example is to keep the hardware pull-up ^ and follow it with ! to invert the pin logic, but the ! is missing. Signed-off-by: Tom Dunn <[email protected]>
1 parent 593486f commit 0c521b6

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

docs/Config_checks.md

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ The QUERY_ENDSTOPS command should report the endstop as "TRIGGERED".
6767

6868
If the endstop appears inverted (it reports "open" when triggered and
6969
vice-versa) then add a "!" to the pin definition (for example,
70-
"endstop_pin: ^PA2"), or remove the "!" if there is already one
70+
"endstop_pin: ^!PA2"), or remove the "!" if there is already one
7171
present.
7272

7373
If the endstop does not change at all then it generally indicates that

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)