Bug: JS code cannot be folded and has highlight problems sometimes

[ZIV-LY]

Describe the bug

1. JavaScript code cannot be folded sometimes even though I input the fold and the title shows "folded code". I close and reopen the note, the code block is open again.
2. Sometimes the code block has highligh problem in Javascript code. I thought it may be there is === and !== in the Javascript code.

Screenshots

Thank you for your help!

[mayurankv]

Oh that is very weird! Could you provide the raw markdown for some code that doesn't fold please! (as many examples as you have would be great!)

[evensolberg]

Any code with == in it gets highlighted, as that is the Markdown code to highlight. I'm seeing the same problem with Rust code.

Example:

let logits = logits.squeeze(0).unwrap().squeeze(0).unwrap().to_dtype(DType::F32).unwrap();
let logits = if self.repeat_penalty == 1.0 {
    logits
} else {
    let start_at = tokens.len().saturating_sub(self.repeat_last_n);
    candle_transformers::utils
        ::apply_repeat_penalty(&logits, self.repeat_penalty, &tokens[start_at..])
        .unwrap()
};

This turns on highlighting until the next == is found. Collapsing the code block hides the problem.

[mayurankv]

I'm unable to replicate the highlighting. Can I ask whether you are aware of any settings or plugins that could affect this? Are you able to replicate it in a sandbox vault? Would appreciate any further info!

[mayurankv]

Also is this in reading mode, editing mode or both?

[ZIV-LY]

Sorry for the confusion. I find it is not just because of "===". The following is the test code. Please have a try:

const rehearse = true; // Set this to false to actually make changes
const moveToTop = false; // Set this to true to move to top instead of deleting. This can help make "extra" sortable.

var fieldName = "extra";

// Choose the patterns to remove by uncommenting the following lines
var remPattens = [];
remPattens.push(new RegExp("^Citations \\(.+\\):", "i"));  // Citation pattern from zoterocitationcounts
remPattens.push(new RegExp("^\\d+ citations \\(.+\\)", "i")); // Citation pattern from zoterocitationcounts
remPattens.push(new RegExp("^ZSCC:.*$", "i")); // ZSCC: 000000
remPattens.push(new RegExp("^\\d+\\s*$", "i")); // 000000
// remPattens.push(new RegExp("^.+", "i")); // Uncomment this to completely wipe out the field

var fieldID = Zotero.ItemFields.getID(fieldName);
var s = new Zotero.Search();
s.libraryID = ZoteroPane.getSelectedLibraryID();
var ids = await s.search();
if (!ids.length) {
    return "No items found";
}
msg += 'the "'+fieldName+'" field will change from: \n' + currentVal + '\n === TO ====> \n' + newValue;
update_counter = 0;
// ids = ids.slice(0, 100); // To try out only on the first 10 items
await Zotero.DB.executeTransaction(async function () {
    for (let id of ids) {
        let item = await Zotero.Items.getAsync(id);
        let mappedFieldID = Zotero.ItemFields.getFieldIDFromTypeAndBase(item.itemTypeID, fieldName);
        let thisFieldName = mappedFieldID ? mappedFieldID : fieldID;
        let currentVal = item.getField(thisFieldName);
        let lines = currentVal.split("\n");
        for (let remPathern of remPattens){
            let lines_match = lines.filter(ex => remPathern.test(ex));
            let lines_nomatch = lines.filter(ex => !remPathern.test(ex));
            if (moveToTop){
                lines = lines_match.concat(lines_nomatch);
            } else { // Delete
                lines = lines_nomatch;
            }
        }
        newValue = lines.join("\n");
        if (currentVal!=newValue){
            if (rehearse){
                let title = item.getField('title');
                let msg = 'This is just a rehearsal. If your run this, \nfor item with title "'+title+'",\n';
                msg += 'the "'+fieldName+'" field will change from: \n' + currentVal + '\n === TO ====> \n' + newValue;
                if (!confirm(msg)) return;
            } else {
                update_counter += 1;
                item.setField(thisFieldName, newValue);
                await item.save();    
            }
        }
    }
});
msg += 'the "'+fieldName+'" field will change from: \n' + currentVal + '\n === TO ====> \n' + newValue;
return update_counter + " of the total " + ids.length + " item(s) updated";

Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test Test test test

msg += 'the "'+fieldName+'" field will change from: \n' + currentVal + '\n === TO ====> \n' + newValue;

[mayurankv]

Thank you I will give this a try and let you know!

[sjhsbhqf]

When I was recording Thinking Claude's cues in my notes using collapsible code blocks, I encountered some bugs.

Here is the beginning of the prompt word. Rendering is fine

After a flag with a ``` in the middle, then it can't be rendered:

[mayurankv]

This is still an outstanding issue I need to come back to, but for the second issue with the ``` flag, is this not expected behaviour in Obsidian? Does it work without the plugin (i.e. the codeblock continues otherwise?). I was under the impression that the nested inner codeblocks should have less backticks, i.e. the outer codeblock should be started with 4 backticks

[sjhsbhqf]

@mayurankv
Hello, I noticed that if the code styler plugin is disabled, the rendering effect in the two images above changes to the two images below, showing a continuous rendering effect.

So I think it should be allowed to exist such code blocks.

If you want to test it out, you can check this project: https://github.com/richards199999/Thinking-Claude

it is in the model instructions directory.

[mayurankv]

This should be addressed in the latest refactor. When that is pushed, I'll update here, then let me know if its still an issue!