-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why did I get a higher FROC than in the paper #6
Comments
Here's the full code, I didn't make any changes to it:# https://github.com/MaciejMazurowski/duke-dbt-data/blob/master/duke_dbt_data.py from typing import AnyStr, BinaryIO, Dict, List, NamedTuple, Optional, Union import matplotlib def evaluate(
def _froc( def _is_tp( def _distance(box_pred: NamedTuple, box_true: NamedTuple) -> float: path = r'D:\pycharm project\dataset\dbt duke\manifest-1617905855234' |
I used your code to run the results in DBTex, but got a higher FROC. What's the reason for this? For example, this is the result for BYU_BTEAM:
{'sensitivity_at_2_fps_all': 0.9632352941176471, 'sensitivity_at_1_fps_positive': 0.9382352941176471, 'sensitivity_at_2_fps_positive': 0.9705882352941176, 'sensitivity_at_3_fps_positive': 0.9705882352941176, 'sensitivity_at_4_fps_positive': 0.9779411764705882, 'mean_sensitivity_positive': 0.9643382352941177}
The result in the paper was 95.7 and I got 96.43.
Thx.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: