-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 619
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Metrics Collection #249
Comments
/cc @docker/fiesta-cucaracha-maintainers @ehazlett |
+1 for builtin metrics. I like the idea of the collector as it keeps things very light on the node side as they just expose their current status and no storage is needed. The collector can then scrape on whatever interval they desire and the processing and storage is on the collector. |
Oh wait I think I misunderstood. Would the collector be on each node or external? If on the node, what would it be collecting? |
+1 on metric collection. I think it great to have a default and swappable monitoring framework. It enables cluster state reporting, utilization monitoring, alerting, auto-scaling,etc. We may investigate how to deploy it using V2 declarative API. |
This is in the same spirit as #248, summary from the other conversation (with s/logging/metrics/): We do not support distributed metrics in the product - we just make sure distributed metrics can be deployed on the platform and engines configured to leverage it. Maybe someday we'll auto deploy it, but in the meantime we'll just document it as a recipe. Makes sense? |
Labeling this as a docs issue - we'd need to come up with a recipe and make sure it's well supported /cc @sfsmithcha @mgoelzer |
We should have a way to do metrics collection, either by supporting a solution and implementing it by documenting it, or shipping with a default.
A possible solution would be to deploy a prometheus and run collectors on every node.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: