Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Metrics Collection #249

Open
aluzzardi opened this issue Apr 6, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Metrics Collection #249

aluzzardi opened this issue Apr 6, 2016 · 6 comments
Milestone

Comments

@aluzzardi
Copy link
Member

We should have a way to do metrics collection, either by supporting a solution and implementing it by documenting it, or shipping with a default.

A possible solution would be to deploy a prometheus and run collectors on every node.

@aluzzardi
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @docker/fiesta-cucaracha-maintainers @ehazlett

@ehazlett
Copy link
Contributor

ehazlett commented Apr 6, 2016

+1 for builtin metrics.

I like the idea of the collector as it keeps things very light on the node side as they just expose their current status and no storage is needed. The collector can then scrape on whatever interval they desire and the processing and storage is on the collector.

@ehazlett
Copy link
Contributor

ehazlett commented Apr 6, 2016

Oh wait I think I misunderstood. Would the collector be on each node or external? If on the node, what would it be collecting?

@dongluochen
Copy link
Contributor

+1 on metric collection. I think it great to have a default and swappable monitoring framework. It enables cluster state reporting, utilization monitoring, alerting, auto-scaling,etc. We may investigate how to deploy it using V2 declarative API.

@aluzzardi
Copy link
Member Author

aluzzardi commented Apr 7, 2016

@ehazlett @dongluochen

This is in the same spirit as #248, summary from the other conversation (with s/logging/metrics/):

We do not support distributed metrics in the product - we just make sure distributed metrics can be deployed on the platform and engines configured to leverage it. Maybe someday we'll auto deploy it, but in the meantime we'll just document it as a recipe.

Makes sense?

@aluzzardi
Copy link
Member Author

Labeling this as a docs issue - we'd need to come up with a recipe and make sure it's well supported

/cc @sfsmithcha @mgoelzer

@aluzzardi aluzzardi added this to the M4 milestone Apr 30, 2016
@stevvooe stevvooe modified the milestones: 1.13.0, 1.12.0 Aug 8, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants