-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make sorting smarter #98
Comments
To simplify things we could just sort by distance. If a beacon hasn't been seen for |
Having the history and the distance (almost ready to be shown) have you already agreed a way of sorting the tiles @wilsonpage? Also, I think this would be good to have to avoid the fact that when you refresh the app being in the same conditions (same beacons, same place), the tiles are sorted in different ways. That could be very confusing when using the app by new users. |
I really like the idea of visually marking 'new' (not previously discovered) tiles in some way. Like when you open your inbox, you can quickly see which items require your attention. |
That would be a nice solution :) |
Yes that would be useful too. I also made a comment just today (as I catch up on old email) that it might be worth thinking about how does content expire - you've seen it x number of times and you haven't interacted with it. Perhaps you're just not interested. I think all of this is going to require numerous iterations and trials with people to get it right. |
The scroll-view list items are not sorted intelligently. We should define a sorting 'score' based on when the tile was last seen and how close the beacon is to the user.
Rule: Closest most recently seen tile wins.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: