You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems we have to really carefully test this new implementation.
There is a subtle error here:
t = Steno.push(2);
t.quelle(\i, { Impulse.ar(3) });
t.filter(\f, { |in, controls| RLPF.ar(in, Rand(4000, 8000), 0.01) });
t.filter(\d, { |in, controls| DelayL.ar(in, 0.2, SinOsc.kr(0.3, Rand(0, 2pi)).range(0, 0.2)) });
// all these are ok
-- i
-- if
-- if if
-- i[f f]
-- i[f f]d
-- i[f df]
-- i[f fd]
// but these are wrong (both signals go through the same delay)
-- i[fd fd]
-- i[(fd)(fd)]
It seems we have to really carefully test this new implementation.
There is a subtle error here:
The structure is this (correct):
but somehow the signal flow doesn't follow it correctly.
The dumped node tree is:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: