-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add code style page #36
Conversation
How was this generated? Was it using some tool or something? I'm generally -1 to putting highly technical things like this on the website until we have more of a community site. As it is right now, it's more of a brochure site and I think we should keep it very simple. This style guide seems better to go in the Neovim wiki, and then link to it from the Readme file in the main neovim repo. |
Ok I will create a repo for the style guide and host it there |
FWIW, I think the main website is the right place--what better way to start a community site than by trying to get it in place? It'd be nice if it could be easily translated and put on the wiki, but I don't think it can. if it helps, the style guide was derived from Google's C++ Style Guide: https://code.google.com/p/google-styleguide/ And no, it's not generated. :-( |
I think the website is the right place too, just not right now. Right now, it's a very simple site, and I think we should keep it that way as long as possible. My main hangup on this is that right now, it's a one page site describing the mission of the project and how to get involved. Something very technical like this doesn't belong on the main site. I'm not opposed to setting up a separate subsite for developer information, but we need to plan what's going to be there and not just toss random things into it. |
That seems contradictory to me, but I think what you're saying here is that there should be a developer.neovim.org or community.neovim.org site. I guess I don't know what advantage there is to separating it that way, but I'm not too concerned about it--I'm sure it's in good hands. :-) Personally, I think a "Get Involved" section would:
Anyways, that was just some of my thoughts. :-) |
@jdavis I've create a new-repository and pulled the code style commits from your mirror. I've also added you to the development-wiki to the team since you already had the initiative of forking the style guide(I hope that's ok) The style can be found here |
@tarruda Yup, that's fine by me! =D |
This is the code style, I guess we should host it into the website.
Not sure if we should put a link to it in the main page though, perhaps linking from the wiki is more appropriate. What do you guys think?