Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using async channels instead of crossbeam #81

Open
msdrigg opened this issue Jul 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Consider using async channels instead of crossbeam #81

msdrigg opened this issue Jul 14, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@msdrigg
Copy link

msdrigg commented Jul 14, 2022

I was following the issue here eaze/tracing-honeycomb#9, and it seems that some environments are having issues with this library (I myself am not one of these currently). There is a fork of this library that uses async channels (https://github.com/agrinman/libhoney-rust) and this has resolved those issues for some.

Additionally, it just seems like the more cohesive approach would be to use async channels because this library is built on async anyway.

@nlopes
Copy link
Owner

nlopes commented Jul 24, 2022

Indeed it is. I'll take a look at this - has been a while. I think when I first took a stab at the lib async wasn't stable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants