-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decide whether to consolidate semiotic and semiotic-docs repo #572
Comments
@alexeyraspopov & I have been discussing it and we feel like combining the main repo and the docs repo is the way to go. So, unless anyone has a compelling counterargument, that's how we're going to do it. |
There are several benefits from having docs as a part of main repo I see:
I was planning to open a PR to pull the docs in this repo, possibly preserving git history. |
I agree. Let's do it. |
Decision made to create a monorepo. @alexeyraspopov will get us started on combining the repos. |
@emeeks I tried to figure out which branch of semiotic-docs to pull in, and I'm not sure: Do you remember any specific items from |
@alexeyraspopov I did an interactive rebase of the branches in the semiotic-docs repo. This branch (semi-together) should resolve conflicts with main and have the 4 commits ahead from semiotic-2. Building the styleguidist docs works from head of the semi-together branch. |
@willingc, the branch looks good, I'll use it for migration. Thanks! |
The PR is ready: #578 |
As we move to 2.0 and beyond, let's take a look at modernizing our documentation toolchain and content.
Possible ideas and random thoughts (please share more in the chat):
FYI @emeeks @alexeyraspopov David Gwer (asked status on Slack)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: