You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: README.md
+52
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -44,3 +44,55 @@ No comparison or validation is done on common values.
44
44
## Additional uses
45
45
46
46
If you want to do your own thing with the data, you could import this module, access `MassTable().full_data`, then sort, slice and filter the resultant dataframe to your heart's content.
47
+
48
+
For example, track how the accuracy of the mass excess of 18B changes once it is experimentally measured
Or for all of the A=100 isotopes from the 2012 table that have a mass-excess error < 10.0keV, print the A, Z, symbol and year of discovery
61
+
```python
62
+
>>>import pynch.mass_table as mt
63
+
>>> df = mt.MassTable().full_data
64
+
>>> df.query('TableYear == 2012 and A == 100 and NubaseMassExcessError < 10.0')[['A', 'Z', 'Symbol', 'DiscoveryYear']]
65
+
A Z Symbol DiscoveryYear
66
+
TableYear
67
+
201210040 Zr 1970
68
+
201210041 Nb 1967
69
+
201210042 Mo 1930
70
+
201210043 Tc 1952
71
+
201210044 Ru 1931
72
+
201210047 Ag 1970
73
+
201210048 Cd 1970
74
+
```
75
+
Or how does the NUBASE mass-excess compare with the AME value for experimentally measured isotopes from the latest table? Which are the 10 isotopes with the biggest differences?
76
+
```python
77
+
>>>import pynch.mass_table as mt
78
+
>>> df = mt.MassTable().full_data
79
+
>>># Create a new column comparing the measured values
0 commit comments