libfuzzer
Folders and files
Name | Name | Last commit date | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
parent directory.. | ||||
This directory contains tests to be run with clang's libFuzzer. It will generate data, pass this data to the function LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const char *Data, size_t Size) of the test and track the code execution. Should the test crash, libFuzzer will provide you with the data which triggered the crash. You can then use this to debug and fix the called code. ! Please note: The purpose of fuzz testing is to find unexpected code paths. Running fuzz tests may! ! result in unforeseen behavior, including loss of data. Consider running the tests in an isolated ! ! environment, e.g. on a virtual machine. You have been warned. ! To run a test with libFuzzer: 1. Install clang 5.0 or later, e.g. from the repositories of the Linux distribution you are using. Depending on the version of clang and the source you are installing from, you might have to install libFuzzer for this version of clang explicitly. 2. Make sure clang and clang++ from this version of clang are found in PATH. 3. Configure Qt with -platform linux-clang -sanitize fuzzer-no-link or, if you are using clang 5 -platform linux-clang -- -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard to add the needed code coverage instrumentation. Since speed of execution is crucial for fuzz testing, it's recommendable to also use the switches -release -static It might also make sense to add sanitizers by passing -sanitize <...> 4. Build Qt. 5. Build one of the tests using this Qt build. 6. Execute the resulting executable. Depending on the expected input format of the tested function, you will get results faster if you: * provide a set of interesting input data by passing the path of a directory which contains these data, each in one file. You can find such data sets in the subdirectory "fuzzing/testcases" of the qtqa repository. * pass a so-called dictionary listing keywords of the input format using -dict=<dictionary file> A couple of such dictionaries are provided by AFL (http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/) * tell libFuzzer to generate only ASCII data using -only_ascii=1 For further info about libFuzzer, see https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html Some of these tests are continuously being run on oss-fuzz, a service by Google for fuzzing free software. It is documented at: https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/ You can find: - The build logs for Qt at https://oss-fuzz-build-logs.storage.googleapis.com/index.html#qt - The code coverage of the running fuzzers at https://storage.googleapis.com/oss-fuzz-coverage/qt/reports/20201104/linux/report.html Update the date in the URL to get more recent data. - The found issues which were already published at: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/list?q=proj%3Dqt You can reproduce issues found by oss-fuzz using their Docker images, see https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/advanced-topics/reproducing/ Alternatively, you can also reproduce it locally with a native build: 1. Read the tested submodule, the test's project and the architecture from the report. For all findings since November 2020, you get the former from the "Fuzz Target". For example, "qtbase_gui_text_qtextdocument_sethtml" is fuzzing qtbase using the project in qtbase/tests/libfuzzer/gui/text/qtextdocument/sethtml/ The architecture you can find in "Job Type". If it contains "i386" it is a 32-bit x86 build, otherwise it is an x86_64 build. Sometimes you can reproduce issues on both architectures. 2. Build Qt including the tested submodule and its dependencies on the respective architecture with the used sanitizer (see above). The sanitizer is also written in the report. It is usually needed to reproduce the issue. 3. Use this Qt build to build the test's project. For example: <qt-build>/qtbase/bin/qt-cmake -S "<src>/qtbase/tests/libfuzzer/gui/text/qtextdocument/sethtml/" cmake --build . 4. Download the "Reproducer Testcase" from the report. 5. Start the binary resulting from step 3 and pass the testcase. For example: ./sethtml input.html You should get the same symptoms as described in the report.